Friday Jul 4 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

July 10, 2007

Storming the Red Mosque

"Pakistan is the most dangerous country in the world" is one of those cliches that you often hear when people discuss world affairs. The basic equation is: unstable country + nuclear weapons + mad mullahs + base for al Qaeda = Big Trouble.

For the past few years, the west’s backing for President Musharraf has been based largely on the idea that,  for all his flaws, he remains a reliable ally in the "war on terror" and the best insurance against the radicialisation of Pakistan. It is a policy reminiscent of Hilaire Belloc’s advice to "Always keep a hold of nurse/For fear of finding something worse".

The storming of the Red Mosque will bolster Musharraf’s reputation as a bulwark against Islamist extremism. When I visited Pakistan a couple of months ago, western diplomats in Islamabad were clearly nervous about the development of a Taliban-style mosque just down the road. Many middle-class Pakistanis didn’t seem too delighted either.

But the picture is more complicated than it might first appear. It is not just that the bloodshed at the mosque may spark an unpredictable backlash. It is also that Pakistani governments - Musharraf’s included - have long had a very ambiguous relationship with Islamists.

Like the United States, Pakistan struck a Faustian bargain with the fundamentalists who fought the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, training, encouraging and equipping them. But unlike the US, the Pakistani authorities have never renounced fully this relationship. The Pakistani intelligence services (the ISI) has maintained links with the Taliban, partly because it fears that a stable, democratic Afghanistan (distant, as that prospect seems) might move into India’s orbit. It may not be entirely coincidental that the Red Mosque is rather close to ISI headquarters in Islamabad.

But Taliban-style fundamentalism is now becoming a threat to Pakistan itself. The Islamists do not seem to have huge electoral support, they are still well below 20 per cent. But suicide-bombings are now a regular feature of life in Peshawar, the largest Pakistani city near Afghanistan, which is just a couple of hours drive from Islamabad. The Pakistani army’s ability to operate in the frontier provinces with Afghanistan, where al-Qaeda has been re-building, has also been steadily eroding. Some western analysts think the situation is actually even worse than that. The cover story in Foreign Affairs last May pointed out that "Many senior Pakistani politicians say privately that they believe that the ISI still has extensive links to bin Laden; some even claim it harbours him."

The increasing radicalism of the Red Mosque signalled that the Islamists were establishing a real foothold in the Pakistani capital. Some western analysts despaired of President Musharraf’s willingness ever to take on the Islamists. This school of thought may be grimly encouraged by the decision to storm the Red Mosque. I suspect that President Musharraf would still like to avoid an all-out conflict with the Islamists and al-Qaeda forces in the frontier provinces. But that may be where he is now heading, come what may.

View a picture gallery of the raid on the Red Mosque

3 Responses to “Storming the Red Mosque”

Comments

  1. Hi Gideon,
    I couldn’t agree more with your Belloc sentiment. At a recent closed meeting at Cambridge a former Head of SIS and a senior CIA anti-terrorist director both stated that the worst case scenario right now in the so-called war on terrorism, would be the assassination of Musharraf; leaving a Muslim nuclear armed country in the hands of fundamentalists.
    They’ve got a point.

    Posted by: Tim | July 11th, 2007 at 9:24 am | Report this comment
  2. Although Mr. Rachman refers to the “dangerousness of Pakistan” as a cliché, one cannot help agreeing with the plausibility of the scenario of a swift regime change in Pakistan and a takeover by the elements of the Pakistani military that have been friends and supporters of the Taliban.
    The consequences are likely to be huge and far more long-lasting than any individual acts of terrorism in the West such as the 9/11 and the 7/7.

    The Red Mosque incident shows the weakness of the Musharraf administration quite starkly. Islamabad is the purpose-built political capital of Pakistan. It is as near to the seat of power as you can get, it is also a new city with a large number of middle class, civil service types. That such a centre of radicalism such as the Red Mosque should grow in Islamabad and should be so difficult to remove indicates far less control and far more serious troubles brewing in more remote places such as the frontier province, Peshawar and Baluchistan (which ironically used as a base by the Americans to encourage Taliban-inspired terrorism against Iran!!).

    Finally, the attack on the Red Mosque has echoes of Indira Gandhi’s assault on the Sikhs’ Golden Temple in Amritsar. Mrs. Gandhi paid with her life. Would Musharraf?

    P

    Posted by: Pacifist | July 11th, 2007 at 10:00 am | Report this comment
  3. Yes, hang on to El Salvador’s death squads for fear of the communists; hang on to Yeltsin for fear of Zhirinovsky; hang on to the Algerian miltary for fear of the FIS; hang on to Mubarak and Musharraf and the House of Saud. What harm can possibly come of that?

    Posted by: S | July 11th, 2007 at 11:53 am | Report this comment

Post a comment

Comment Policy



As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business

Further Reading