Back to Gideon RachmanWell, I’m sorry but that was a bit of an anti-climax. Straining to be generous in my column this morning, I wrote that I was sure that Obama would “blow them away”. Actually, I don’t think he did.
Of course, it was impossible to live up to the wildly-inflated expectations. The “Daily Show” nicely satirised these by predicting that Obama’s oration would be so brilliant that it “makes the Gettysburg address seem like a series of simian grunts.” But the actual speech was a bit flat and predictable.
Parts of it sounded like they were written by a 27-year-old sitting in Starbucks - perhaps because they actually were written by a 27-year-old sitting in Starbucks , one Jon Favreau. Some of the lines didn’t even make sense. We will “roll back the spectre of a warming planet.” Sorry, but how do you roll back a spectre? Sounds like frustrating work. There was also a bad case of mixed metaphors - “We have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter…” Mr President, you can do better than that.
As for the actual message of the speech, I think it was broadly as I predicted this morning. Sacrifice, responsibility, take our inspiration from our forefathers - and so on. On substance, I was surprised by how much sub-Bushian rhetoric there was about vanquishing terrorists - but maybe he needed that to balance the fairly clear repudiation of the excesses of the “war on terror”. I thought it was bold to say that the US is a nation of “Christians and Muslims”. There was a swift kick at greedy bankers, but that’s more or less obligatory these days. And there was a promise to work with the rest of the world. Nothing objectionable there, but nothing too remarkable either.
Or have I completely missed the point?
This blog covers a variety of topics from US foreign policy to European politics and the Middle East - and whatever else happens to be in the news or catch my attention. I joined the FT as chief foreign affairs commentator in 2006, after a 15-year career at The Economist which included stints as a correspondent in Brussels, Bangkok and Washington. I write a weekly column on foreign affairs, which appears in the paper on Tuesdays. Occasionally my FT colleagues contribute posts to this blog.
Geoff Dyer is the FT's China bureau chief. He has been a correspondent in Shanghai and in Brazil and has also covered the pharmaceuticals and biotechnology industries from London.
Roula Khalaf is the FT's Middle East editor. She has worked for the FT since 1995, first as North Africa correspondent, then Middle East correspondent and most recently as Middle East editor. Before joining the FT, she was a staff writer for Forbes magazine in New York. 
James Blitz is the FT's defence and diplomatic editor. He has been the FT's political editor, based in London, and Rome bureau chief. James is a former Moscow bureau chief for the Sunday Times.
Alan Beattie is the FT's world trade editor. He has previously been economics leader writer and spent two years in Washington DC as chief US economics correspondent. Before joining the FT, Alan was an economist at the Bank of England. 
Victor Mallet is the FT's Madrid correspondent. He is a former Asia editor of the FT, and, in more than 20 years at the organisation, has also worked in Africa, Europe and the Middle East. In 1990 he escaped from Kuwait after being one of the few foreign correspondents there when Iraq invaded. 
Stefan Wagstyl is the FT's eastern Europe editor, co-ordinating coverage of the region. He has also been the FT's bureau chief in Tokyo and New Delhi.
