Back to Gideon RachmanBy Geoff Dyer, the FT’s China bureau chief
You have to hand it to the Dalai Lama for his sense of timing. Only a few weeks ago, he was quietly shunned by the White House - the first time in nearly two decades that he did not stop by while visiting Washington. Yet this week the Dalai Lama is back in the headlines with his visit to Arunachal Pradesh in north-eastern India, prompting outraged protests from China which claims part of the region as its own and calls it ‘southern Tibet’. The visit has been planned for months but coming as President Barack Obama is packing his bags for his first trip to Beijing, it helps keep a bit of a squeeze on the White House.
In truth, Tibet is building up to be an early test of the Obama administration’s ideas on engagement. The President declined to meet the Dalai Lama in part because he did not want a bust-up with Beijing on the eve of his trip. But it was also part of a conciliatory strategy with China which the White House hopes might be rewarded with resumption of talks between Beijing and the Dalai Lama’s representatives.
My hunch is that this approach will not get very far. Indeed, Beijing already appears to have hardened its stance, saying that one pre-condition for talks is that the Dalai Lama does not discuss politics when he is overseas. (”I once told his personal representative that it was inhumane for you to let such an aged person to go on errand at very high frequency,” Zhu Weiqun, the Chinese official who represents the government in talks on Tibet, said in an interview last month.) The financial crisis in the west has increased China’s power and confidence and it seems to be using this moment of rising influence to push its case on Tibet more forecefully.
That leaves President Obama facing a desperately delicate rhetorical task in China. The whole thrust of the trip is to try and establish a good working relationship with Beijing, not to lecture. But if he stays quiet on Tibet - and then does not meet the Dalai Lama soon after, as the Tibetans say they were promised - China is likely to redouble its efforts to isolate the Dalai Lama. If smaller countries think the White House is wavering, they are not going to stand in Beijing’s way.
This blog covers a variety of topics from US foreign policy to European politics and the Middle East - and whatever else happens to be in the news or catch my attention. I joined the FT as chief foreign affairs commentator in 2006, after a 15-year career at The Economist which included stints as a correspondent in Brussels, Bangkok and Washington. I write a weekly column on foreign affairs, which appears in the paper on Tuesdays. Occasionally my FT colleagues contribute posts to this blog.
Geoff Dyer is the FT's China bureau chief. He has been a correspondent in Shanghai and in Brazil and has also covered the pharmaceuticals and biotechnology industries from London.
Roula Khalaf is the FT's Middle East editor. She has worked for the FT since 1995, first as North Africa correspondent, then Middle East correspondent and most recently as Middle East editor. Before joining the FT, she was a staff writer for Forbes magazine in New York. 
James Blitz is the FT's defence and diplomatic editor. He has been the FT's political editor, based in London, and Rome bureau chief. James is a former Moscow bureau chief for the Sunday Times.
Alan Beattie is the FT's world trade editor. He has previously been economics leader writer and spent two years in Washington DC as chief US economics correspondent. Before joining the FT, Alan was an economist at the Bank of England. 
Victor Mallet is the FT's Madrid correspondent. He is a former Asia editor of the FT, and, in more than 20 years at the organisation, has also worked in Africa, Europe and the Middle East. In 1990 he escaped from Kuwait after being one of the few foreign correspondents there when Iraq invaded. 
Stefan Wagstyl is the FT's eastern Europe editor, co-ordinating coverage of the region. He has also been the FT's bureau chief in Tokyo and New Delhi.
