Ethics, Obama and Blagojevich

December 11th, 2008 12:57pm

What a delight to discover that the governor of Illinois seems to have wandered in off the set of the “The Sopranos”. When Rod Blagojevich says of his right to appoint Barack Obama’s successor in the Senate - “I’ve got this thing and it’s f***ing golden, and I’m not going to give it up for f***ing nothing,” - it could be Tony Soprano himself speaking.

There is also a lovely contrast between the unbelievably sleazy reality of Illinois politics and the absurdly prim and exacting ethics-standards demanded from potential appointees to the Obama administration. For those of you who haven’t seen it, here is a link to the lengthy questionnaire all job-seekers must fill out. It would seem to me to rule out anybody who is not either a liar or a Mormon missionary.

My favourite is question 14 in section 2, where applicants are asked if they have ever “kept a diary that contains anything that could be a possible source of embarrassment.” Now what diary, worth its salt, does not contain anything that could be embarrassing?

In the light of the Blago scandal, however, perhaps they could add a new question to the  form - “Have you ever been taped by federal prosecutors, discussing the sale of the president-elect’s senate seat in profane language?”

Final thoughts on the world government row

December 11th, 2008 12:18pm

I think I’m going to take the precaution of closing the comments section on this posting, before I open it - so to speak.

But, a couple of final thoughts. First, I am amazed by how many people read that article as a passionate call for the formation of a world government, rather than a dispassionate discussion of the possibility. I began to wonder if I had misunderstood my own article. But I was re-assured (if that’s the word), by a discussion with my sister, who described the piece as - “A slightly dull discussion of a school-boy debating topic that went - on the one hand, on the other hand, probably not.” That seems fair enough to me.

But - amidst all my whinging about my flame mail - I would like to thank my critics for introducing me to a good, new word. Despite being ardent defenders of “democracy” in the abstract, many of these people seem deeply contemptuous of American voters who are stupid enough to do things like vote for Barack Obama, or fail to realise that they are being hoaxed over global warming. These people are dismissed as blind followers of the elite and so are referred to as “the sheeple”, rather than the people. I like that.

Covered in internet slime

December 10th, 2008 1:50pm

I knew that there was something odd going on, when I woke up at 7am on Tuesday and found that over 200 e-mails had arrived in the seven hours that I had been in bed. It turned out that my article on world government had been “Drudged” - ie put on the much-read Drudge Report and this had set off a torrent of e-mail traffic.

The pace of comments - and their vituperative tone - persuaded the blog-masters here to shut down the comments section on that article pretty quickly. But this had the unfortunate effect of encouraging people to e-mail me directly. The following from one reader is fairly typical:

“Just wanted to let you know that you’re never gonna get your New World Order.
People are waking up everyday to what’s really going on ….Good luck gettin’ the guns you traitor piece of trash!!”

If you get two e-mails like that it can be faintly unsettling. If you get 200, however, you begin to get used to it. That said, the whole experience has given me an insight into the mindset of the gun-toting, bible-bashing, nationalistic bit of the United States. Here are my conclusions. Continue reading "Covered in internet slime"

Stay tuned…

August 22nd, 2008 1:12pm

Gideon is returning from holidays and will be blogging again next week, when he’ll be at the Democratic convention in Denver. Expect a first post late Monday.

On being a moron

October 31st, 2007 1:23pm

This morning I woke up with a start and immediately reached for the Blackberry on my bedside table. This is an incredibly bad habit, which I must rid myself of. Among the messages that had come in overnight was this comment posted on the blog by WCM, who makes "no apologies" for his rudeness. He suggests that I am not doing my job properly because I am writing about trivia and neglecting important issues like developments on the Turkish-Kurdish border, developments in Pakistan, the world of private equity etc…

WCM is not alone in his concerns. When I mentioned to my colleague Lucy Kellaway that I was planning to write about celebrities this week, she looked slightly concerned and said - "Isn’t that a bit moronic?" However, since her previous column had been devoted to seeing how many swear-words she could get into the FT in one go, I did not feel Lucy was in a position to preach. (I recommend the podcast incidentally).

However, the issue raised by WCM and LK is a valid one. My answer is that the question I ask when choosing a topic for my column (or indeed for the blog) is not - what is the most important thing going on in the world? It is - do I have anything original to say about this?

Continue reading "On being a moron"

Wikipedia and crowd-sourcing

August 31st, 2007 9:18am

I have a guilty confession to make. I love Wikipedia. I had not realised this was a particular source of shame until I went to a recent conference on the new media. Speaker after speaker said that, of course, no responsible journalist would take facts off Wikipedia, which is notoriously full of errors. I said nothing. I’m sure I’ve done this lots of times - usually uncontroversial little, fact-checky things. But data all the same.

In fact, I was at it again this afternoon - as I was researching my newspaper column for next week (small trailer) on sex scandals (out on Tuesday!!!!). Put in almost any name into Google - Bill Clinton, Jeremy Thorpe, Tony Blair - and it is likely that the Wikipedia entry will be the thing that comes up first. It’s really useful.

Continue reading "Wikipedia and crowd-sourcing"

World leaders and their spare time

June 22nd, 2007 9:34am

Tony Blair is working right up to the last minute. Some FT colleagues and I went to see him earlier this week, for top-secret discussions about the future of Europe. But just as interesting as the off-the-record stuff (I thought), was what Blair had to say about the Oscar-winning film, “The Queen” – which portrays Blair and the Queen, dealing with the aftermath of the death of Princess Diana.

Continue reading "World leaders and their spare time"

Andrew Sullivan’s conservative soul

October 20th, 2006 4:38pm

Are bloggers capable of coherent thought? Or does the pressure to keep gabbing work against sustaining a complex argument? For obvious reasons, this is a question that interests me quite a lot. And I must say that reading Andrew Sullivan’s newly-published "The Conservative Soul" (HarperCollins) is mildly encouraging.
Sullivan is one of America’s famous bloggers
. He keeps up a frenetic pace of publication - generally focusing on his particular obsessions: American politics, torture, gay rights, the Iraq war, the evils of Islamism, the evils of the Christian right.
In his new book he focuses on the nature of conservatism. A key part of the argument is that in the United States, the Reaganite conservative tradition which focused on liberty and small government has been subverted by the growing power of Christian fundamentalism over the Republican party. Sullivan calls George W. Bush "the most powerful Christian fundamentalist in the world." While traditional conservatism is a humble creed, based on an awareness of the imperfection of human knowledge, Christian fundamentalism is characterised by a dangerous certainty.

Continue reading "Andrew Sullivan’s conservative soul"