Daily Archives: April 30, 2008

Chris Nuttall

Intel CEO with 80-core processorsIntel and Cray have been talking this week about building supercomputers with a million cores or brains, but how will all those processors-within-processors work together and communicate with one another and how difficult will it be to write applications that take advantage of all of them?

This is the question that Stanford University hopes to answer with its Pervasive Parallelism Lab, announced on Wednesday.

“Parallel programming is perhaps the largest problem in computer science today,” said Bill Dally, chair of the Computer Science Department.

“[It] is the major obstacle to the continued scaling of computing performance that has fuelled the computing industry, and several related industries, for the last 40 years.”

The problem has arisen because multi-core processors were too expensive until recently for all but high-performance computers, meaning few programmers have developed the expertise to take advantage of their new, affordable abundance.

Stanford says computer scientists fear the progress of computing could stall and that’s clearly a worry for the major microprocessor suppliers – Intel, AMD, IBM, Nvidia, HP and Sun are all supporting the new lab, which will pool the efforts of the university’s leading computer scientists.

It is also not the first initiative of its kind. Intel and Microsoft announced last month  they were investing $20m in research at the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign  in the same area.

Stanford’s lab has a budget of $6m over three years. The aim is to develop a complete parallel computing system, covering everything from fundamental hardware to new user-friendly programming languages. This could lead to the system doing all the work for developers to optimise their code for parallel processing.

Chris Nuttall

James ChongTim Draper of famed Silicon Valley venture capital firm Draper Fisher Jurvetson has listened to hundreds of pitches from start-ups over the past few years, but only three put themselves forward as alternatives to the online marketplace eBay.

“I was surprised when he told me that,” says James Chong (pictured), founder and chief executive of Wigix, the fourth eBay challenger to cross DFJ’s path.

Wigix’s pitch was impressive enough for the VC firm to lead a recent $5.3m funding round for the Bay Area start-up and for Mr Draper to take a seat on the board.

“EBay has been sitting on its laurels, this area is in real need of innovation,” says Mr Chong.

He spent 11 years at Charles Schwab and the last five setting up its accounts site, before establishing Wigix a year ago.

That explains the financial bent to the marketplace that differentiates itself from eBay by treating items very like company stocks.

EBay started out by offering collectibles, unique items, which goes some way to explaining the site’s sometimes rambling search results.

Wigix argues that most items for auction are now distinct commodities, such as an 8Gb iPod Nano, and they can be found and their market prices tracked more easily by users and search engines when they have their own page and even their own stock-ticker symbol.

Wigix uses the bid/ask principles of buying and selling shares and makes it possible to show current market prices for these commodity items. It says this allows real-time trading and combats the problems on auction sites of shilling and sniping.

A My Wigix section allows users to keep lists of their own possessions, see the market value of them and even name a price at which they would be prepared to sell them.

This gives a notional boost to the liquidity of Wigix’s marketplace. In theory, items may also never leave the marketplace if someone buys something from another user and leaves it on their public list of available items.

Wigix employs around 30 people in offices in Oakland and Beijing, China, but it is encouraging users to help it by suggesting different SKUs and taking ownership of category and product pages. They can earn a cut from advertising on the page and even sell ownership of it to anyone bidding.

Extra features allow users to submit reviews and manuals and ask others about what they think of products they own.

Wigix’s organisation of its auction site makes a lot of sense, but it is likely to be under-represented in items that are hard to classify, such as collectibles and jewellery.

The real test will be whether those items trading as second-hand goods in various conditions can be turned into commodities and traded like stocks and shares.

At its public beta launch on Tuesday, the site was slow and seemed short of inventory, despite its claims of having 500,000 items available.

Nevertheless, it may benefit from dissatisfaction with eBay and its fees structure. Wigix has no listing fees, free trading below $25, a $1.50 fee for buyers above that and a 2 per cent fee for sellers up to $1,000, then 1 per cent above that.

That’s a lot easier to understand than eBay’s complicated explanation of its charges.

Richard Waters

twilight-zone.jpgWhat should we make of the odd limbo into which Microsoft’s pursuit of Yahoo has fallen since the weekend, when it failed to follow through on a threat to go hostile? Here are the possible answers:

1. The two sides are just buying time while they stitch up a deal behind the scenes. Probability: miniscule. We’re still hearing that there haven’t been any discussions since early last week. When the bankers from both sides put their heads together at that point there was still no serious talk about price (one source suggests nothing has changed since day one, with Yahoo still holding out for $40 a share and Microsoft unwilling to budge from its opening offer, which is now worth more like $29.)

2. Microsoft is getting ready to walk away. Probability: a bit higher than miniscule, but not much. Proponents of the walk-away scenario hold that Microsoft has grown disgruntled at being rebuffed and that dissent in its own ranks, where a Yahoo deal is viewed with dread, has dulled its appetite. This sounds too trite. The move on Yahoo is a huge break with Microsoft’s past: the enormity of it points to how vital it is to control one of the Web’s leading advertising platforms (this could eventually become an important monetisation engine for much of its core software business as it moves online.) This takeover approach was not mounted on a whim. Whatever Steve Ballmer’s other character flaws, a lack of resolve is not one of them.

3. Microsoft is still trying to decide how tight it can turn the thumbscrews on Yahoo without incurring a backlash. Probability: Pretty high. The software company has shown an uncharacteristic restraint all along. There have clearly been people in the Microsoft camp who would have gone in all guns blazing from the start, but that is not how Ballmer has chosen to play it. He has probably calculated that there is a better chance of reeling Yahoo in faster by not forcing it to throw up the defences against a hostile bid. Ballmer was on the road in Europe last week, arriving back only over the weekend – after the Saturday deadline he had set three weeks before had already passed – so it makes sense to deliberate thoroughly on this before taking what could be a critical step. The next turn of the thumbscrew seems imminent.

4. (My favourite explanation.) Jerry Yang just had a baby. Maybe Microsoft just decided to take the heat off for a couple of days. Wouldn’t it be nice to believe that was true?

FT techfeed

Tech Blog

Analysis & reviews

About this blog Blog guide
Richard Waters, Chris Nuttall and April Dembosky in the FT's San Francisco bureau share their views - plus tech insights from Tim Bradshaw and Maija Palmer in London and Robin Kwong in Taipei.



Read about the authors


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the FT Tech Hub team: richard.waters@ft.com, chris.nuttall@ft.com, april.dembosky@ft.com, maija.palmer@ft.com, robin.kwong@ft.com and tim.bradshaw@ft.com.

See the full list of FT blogs.

Archive

« Mar May »April 2008
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Tech analysis and reviews

Coding for dummies

Execs learn geek techniques

Time for smartwatches?

Sony synchronises watches with smartphones

Tags

advertising android apple AT&T Electronic Arts Europe Facebook funding google hacking hewlett-packard HP htc instagram intel iPad iphone IPO kindle fire Lenovo London megaupload microsoft Mobile Netflix Nintendo nokia nokia lumia nook patents privacy samsung smartphones social media social networking Sony SOPA Spotify story of the week Tablets Toshiba twitter venture capital Yahoo Zynga