Cyberwar 2.0 in Georgia

The term “cyber warfare” conjures up images of coordinated military attacks mounted to cripple an enemy country’s vital infrastructure.

As the attacks on Georgian government and news Websites in the last few days show, however, the reality is much messier, and might not deserve the term “warfare” at all. It appears to represent an upwelling of antagonism on a broader front, coordinated across the internet to achieve maximum effect. Active government sponsorship is impossible to discern. All very Web 2.0, in fact.

Georgia was quick to accuse Russia of waging cyber warfare over the weekend after massive denial of service attacks against a number of official state Websites. But Jose Nazario, a senior researcher at Arbor Networks in Massachusetts who studied the pattern of attacks, told me his hunch is that this was the work of a loose alliance of hackers and other bad actors, not some sinister, centrally directed government plot.

Back-and-forth denial of service attacks like this (there have also been some in the last few days against Russian sites) have become part and parcel of many tense international situations, according to Nazario. Similar outbursts have occurred at times when China/US relations have been bad and are a frequent feature of Israeli/Palestinian tensions.

In the most celebrated case of “cyber warfare” to date, Estonian Websites came under massive attack in May 2007. In this article in Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Israeli computer security expert Gadi Evron detailed how these were really cyber riots, beginning with Russian bloggers boasting of small-scale assaults and followed by more widespread attacks by botnets.

In a blog post this week, Evron also says he doubts that what is happening in Georgia is cyber war:

Could this somehow be indirect Russian action? Yes, but considering Russia is past playing nice and uses real bombs, they could have attacked more strategic targets or eliminated the infrastructure kinetically. … the nature of what’s going on isn’t clear, but until we are certain anything state-sponsored is happening on the Internet it is my official opinion this is not warfare, but just some unaffiliated attacks by Russian hackers and/or some rioting by enthusiastic Russian supporters.

If smart governments have always known how to use popular uprisings to their advantage, the Web 2.0 world offers many new possibilities.

FT techfeed

Tech Blog

Analysis & reviews

About this blog Blog guide
Richard Waters, Chris Nuttall and April Dembosky in the FT's San Francisco bureau share their views - plus tech insights from Tim Bradshaw and Maija Palmer in London and Robin Kwong in Taipei.



Read about the authors


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the FT Tech Hub team: richard.waters@ft.com, chris.nuttall@ft.com, april.dembosky@ft.com, maija.palmer@ft.com, robin.kwong@ft.com and tim.bradshaw@ft.com.

See the full list of FT blogs.

Archive

« Jul Sep »August 2008
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tech analysis and reviews

Coding for dummies

Execs learn geek techniques

Time for smartwatches?

Sony synchronises watches with smartphones

Tags

advertising android apple AT&T Electronic Arts Europe Facebook funding google hacking hewlett-packard HP htc instagram intel iPad iphone IPO Jawbone Lenovo London megaupload microsoft Mobile Netflix Nintendo nokia nokia lumia patents privacy samsung smartphones social media social networking Sony SOPA Spotify story of the week Tablets Toshiba twitter venture capital Wikipedia Yahoo Zynga