OLPC and the digital commercial divide

Give One Get OneIt seems churlish to question the success using commercial criteria of One Laptop Per Child, when as a non-profit organisation it has done much to raise awareness of the possibilities and need for cheap computing power.

Getting the XO laptop into production and use around the world was an achievement in itself,  but government orders so far have been underwhelming. Only South America has responded in significant numbers, with 100,000+ orders coming from each of Colombia, Uruguay and Peru.

Ironically, it is sales to consumers in the developed world – never part of the original plan – that is pushing the use of the OLPC in Africa and troublespots such as Haiti and Afghanistan.

The Give One Get One campaign announced last year has led to around 100,000 laptops being sent to such countries by US consumers. They were able to pay $399 for an XO for themselves and the right to donate one to a deserving child.

Now the scheme is being extended to consumers worldwide , with the announcement today that orders will be taken by Amazon’s UK site for sales and delivery worldwide, although it does not expect to have inventory until January.

OLPC came out with plans for version two of the laptop in May, which will be more like a digital book, with two touch-sensitive screens.

Nicholas Negroponte, founder and chairman of OLPC, tells me this should cost $75, while, at the same time, he admits that the original “$100″ XO laptop still costs $187. The key is integration, he says, reducing 900 parts to 50-60 components.

But in a tacit admission of the uphill battle OLPC is facing, he says the launch date of two years hence is intended to encourage others to beat the non-profit to market.

“As a non-profit we want people to copy this, the more the better, we would love to see the competition beat us,” he says.

He is looking at the success of the small, cheap netbook category of course, but he says such commercial efforts at supplying cheap computing versus OLPC are like comparing McDonalds to the World Food Programme.

In other words, there is no competition – different markets, different targets, which begs the question of how much any commercial solution can contribute to OLPC’s laudable aims.

FT techfeed

Tech Blog

Analysis & reviews

About this blog Blog guide
Richard Waters, Chris Nuttall and April Dembosky in the FT's San Francisco bureau share their views - plus tech insights from Tim Bradshaw and Maija Palmer in London and Robin Kwong in Taipei.



Read about the authors


To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the FT Tech Hub team: richard.waters@ft.com, chris.nuttall@ft.com, april.dembosky@ft.com, maija.palmer@ft.com, robin.kwong@ft.com and tim.bradshaw@ft.com.

See the full list of FT blogs.

Archive

« Oct Dec »November 2008
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Tech analysis and reviews

Coding for dummies

Execs learn geek techniques

Time for smartwatches?

Sony synchronises watches with smartphones

Tags

advertising android apple AT&T Electronic Arts Europe Facebook funding google hacking hewlett-packard HP htc instagram intel iPad iphone IPO Jawbone Lenovo London megaupload microsoft Mobile Netflix Nintendo nokia nokia lumia patents privacy samsung smartphones social media social networking Sony SOPA Spotify story of the week Tablets Toshiba twitter venture capital Wikipedia Yahoo Zynga