Sunday Sep 7 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

December 19, 2007

Where’s the demand for movies-on-demand?

Moviebeam The lights have gone out for MovieBeam, a set-top box service that failed to grab a significant slice of the movies-on-demand market.

The service closed at the weekend after its parent company Movie Gallery went into Chapter 11 bankruptcy in October.

MovieBeam was launched by Walt Disney in 2003, closed down in 2005 and then relaunched as a spin-off in February 2006 in which Disney, Intel, Cisco and three VC firms invested $48.5m.

Movie Gallery picked it up in March this year for just $10m.

MovieBeam’s $199 set-top box used part of the broadcast spectrum to download up to 100 new movies to its hard drive that could then be rented and watched on the user’s TV.

Its problem was too much competition appearing and too little consumer buy-in to the concept.

MovieBeam competed with video on demand offered by cable companies. Then there were other digital download services such as MovieLink and CinemaNow. These allowed downloads to PCs or laptops, which could be hooked up to a TV.

A whole range of networking devices have also been appearing such as Apple TV and D-Link’s Medialounge player with MediaMall TV channels, which allow content to be readily moved from the PC or internet to the TV screen.

A second wave of services also arrived in the past year – Amazon Unbox on Tivo, Netflix’s free online movie viewing service and Xbox Live’s impressive collection of high-definition material for the TV-connected 360 console.

Akimbo, a similar set-top box service to MovieBeam, has also failed to gain traction. In September, a Silicon Valley start-up launched the $399 Vudu box, which can stream its database of 5,000 movies to a TV over a broadband connection and charge $1 to $4 rental for each movie.

Whether any standalone set-top box service can succeed is questionable, given it has to fight for a place with games consoles and cable and satellite boxes under the TV that can have the same capability.

The television itself is moving towards becoming a device with its own direct connection to the internet, where consumers may prefer to pay for a web-based service, rather than connect up yet another piece of hardware.

Post a comment

Comment Policy




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Gadget GuruThe FT's personal technology expert Paul Taylor answers your gadgetry questions

  • Margaret McCartney's blogA forum by GP and FT opinion columnist on healthcare issues

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world'

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes