Friday May 16 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

February 5, 2008

The iPhone as hand-me-down

One man clearly immune to Steve Jobs’ famed "reality distortion field" is Ad Scheepbouwer, straight-talking CEO of KPN, the Dutch telecoms company. He decided that his iPhone was "pretty useless" so he gave it to his 20-year-old daughter. She didn’t rate it either. "She’s given it to her boyfriend," Mr Scheepbouwer told the FT. "He’s very happy with it, but it’s been three days so we’ll see how it ends."

Given that the iPhone isn’t yet officially available in the Netherlands (or any other country besides the US, UK, France and Germany) that’s surprisingly candid. KPN would like to sell the phone on the Dutch market and Apple has so far chosen to sell the iPhone tied to just one mobile operator in each country. But it probably also reflects what some pundits have said all along: Europeans generally expect to pay less and get more from their phones. There is some evidence for that with the news last month that the iPhone missed its sales target in the UK, where 02 has responded with better value calling plans.

Bring on the iPhone 2.0?

3 Responses to “The iPhone as hand-me-down”

Comments

  1. RE: Comments by Ad Scheepbouwer, CEO of KPN: “I had one and I thought it was a pretty useless phone, to be quite honest,” and “‘We’d be more than happy to sell it,’

    If Mr. Scheepbouwer believes the iPhone to be useless, why would he be happy to sell it to his customers? Either he knows it is a great phone and does not have the guts to state that, or he is not above selling “useless” products to his customers.

    Mr. Steen, could you please interview Mr. Scheepbouwer again and get a truthful answer from this confused man.

    Posted by: Oh Blah Dee Blah Dah | February 6th, 2008 at 5:13 pm | Report this comment
  2. On that point, he drew a distinction between his own opinion of the phone and the likelihood that lots of people will like it.

    Posted by: Michael Steen | February 6th, 2008 at 6:05 pm | Report this comment
  3. Seems to me, this statement is a prime example that integrity is not a required and/or desired quality of today’s corporate management.

    Oh well, by now one would get quite used to ‘useless’ products, and/or CEOs, for that matter.

    Posted by: Alexey Rybak | February 6th, 2008 at 11:16 pm | Report this comment

Post a comment

Comment Policy




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world'

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes