Friday Jul 4 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

April 2, 2008

Google turns a blind eye to under-age searching

kids.jpgDrinking, gambling and… searching?

It seems the list of proscribed activities for the younger set is longer than you thought. A sharp-eyed blogger at CNET spotted last week that Google’s official terms of service explicitly bar anyone under the age of 18 from using any of its services. That’s right: no hanging out on Orkut, no peeping at YouTube, and definitely no searching for someone else’s homework to cut and paste.

So it’s a relief to hear that Google’s lawyers have finally decided to loosen up a bit. From a response just in:

The language regarding the age restriction is an acknowledgment by Google that, in most jurisdictions, an agreement with a minor may not be legally enforceable. Google intends to modify its terms of service to clarify that users under the age of 18 are welcome to use Google’s services, subject to certain limitations based on each specific service.

Get back to it, kids.

3 Responses to “Google turns a blind eye to under-age searching”

Comments

  1. Google is smart! Try the search with a keyword jj (I mistyped it while looking for sthg else) and look at the first “suprising” results from image search.

    Doesn’t it make sense to have the 18+ disclosure now?

    Posted by: Indus Khaitan | April 3rd, 2008 at 7:22 am | Report this comment
  2. very interesting

    Posted by: Kristina | April 4th, 2008 at 6:33 pm | Report this comment
  3. As a future teacher the content that Google returns is a major issue that I will have to deal with. I am fully aware of some of the awful things that you can accidentally come across when trying to search an educational topic. For instance if a student needed to write a paper on the Greek god Aphrodite, and decided to use Google images to find a picture, then I feel sorry for the poor child who would no doubt come across very adult content. Does Google have a search engine based for younger children? And if not I think that would be a very good step for them to take.

    Posted by: justin_m | April 5th, 2008 at 12:25 am | Report this comment

Post a comment

Comment Policy




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world'

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes