Total eclipse of the Sun?

August 4, 2008

If three years ago a company had $7.4bn of cash on hand, but now its entire market cap has fallen to $7.2bn, how much confidence would you have in the management?

That about sums up the state of play at Sun Microsystems. So why aren’t the private equity vultures circling? When the stock traded at a split-adjusted $15-20 it seemed that every buy-out artist in Silicon Valley wanted in. Now the shares are scraping a 13-year low of $9. With the US economy heading down and Sun admitting on Friday that it is heading back into the red, Wall Street seems to have given up on the Schwartz-Lehman turnaround.

One Silicon Valley banker I spoke to scotched any hope of a buy-out, even at these prices: the mess in the debt markets has made it hard to create the right capital structure (Sun used a big chunk of that $7.4bn for an acquisition, though it is still sitting on nearly $3bn.)

This person also discounted the chance of a strategic deal, though the server market might seem to be crying out for some consolidation (Sun’s share slipped to 10.5 per cent in the first quarter, according to IDC, with Dell overtaking it for the first time. A combination of these two would still not challenge leaders IBM and HP.)

Sun’s long-suffering shareholders are left with a tough decision. Is the company simply over-exposed to the US, and to the downturn in spending by financial service and telecom companies - and might it therefore bounce back strongly in better times? Or, despite the success of its Niagara servers, does it have the wrong mix of products - too dependent on the shrinking market for high-margin corporate servers, too weak in the high-volume machines that the “cloud computing” future requires?

3 Responses to “Total eclipse of the Sun?”

Comments

  1. When Jonathan took over the stock was only $4

    Posted by: Scott McNealy | October 3rd, 2008 at 3:39 pm | Report this comment
  2. Now the stock is $7

    Posted by: Scott McNealy | October 3rd, 2008 at 3:40 pm | Report this comment
  3. These are the facts: anyone holding Sun stock when Scott McNealy handed over the CEO job to Jonathan Schwartz has since suffered a 66 per cent loss. At the time (April 2006) the shares stood at nearly $5, but after adjusting for a one-for-four reverse stock split in November last year, the price was nearly $20 a share. They have now fallen to $6.75.

    Posted by: Richard Waters | October 3rd, 2008 at 9:21 pm | Report this comment

Post a comment




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.

FT Techfeed

More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Gadget GuruThe FT's personal technology expert Paul Taylor answers your gadgetry questions

  • Margaret McCartney's blogA forum by GP and FT opinion columnist on healthcare issues

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world'

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK parliament writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • Editors' blogAn insight into the content and production of the Financial Times, written by the decision-makers