Daily Archives: December 22, 2011

This coming year may well be a significant one - the year that world leaders fell asleep just as the world cried out for more leadership.

They will not literally fall asleep. Instead, they will remain active and engaged with domestic concerns - especially the challenges of surviving in office – while ignoring the  many global challenges that demand their urgent attention.

Barack Obama will focus on only one issue in 2012: winning re-election. Like his predecessors, he will not allow external challenges to distract him from the campaign, unless, of course, a potential collapse of the euro threatens to derail it. This is the main reason he finally sent Tim Geithner to give the Europeans a helping hand in December 2011.

Mr Obama will not try to restart the Doha round of trade talks. Free trade has become an untouchable subject in American politics. Nor will he push for more action on climate change. Americans are not clamouring for action in this area. In 2007, when Al Gore won his Nobel Peace Prize, 63 per cent of Americans said global warming posed a “somewhat serious” or “very serious” threat. In 2010, only 53 per cent did so. More dangerously, as Americans become more economically despondent, China will naturally emerge as scapegoat number one. It would be politically suicidal for Mr Obama to tell Americans the hard truth: that China has focused on becoming economically competitive for almost three decades. America, by contrast, assumed that it would remain competitive as a God-given right.

Sadly, China’s leaders will also be in no position to provide global leadership. They too will remain focused on their own leadership transition. It is now more or less known that Xi Jinping and Li Keqiang will succeed Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao. That is the easy part. The hard part is deciding who will be No. 3, 4, 5, and so on. Chinese leaders’ top preoccupation will be to ensure that all goes well with this transition. Too much is at stake here for global challenges to take priority.

The European Union, another traditional global leader, will need at least another year or two to sort out the euro mess. The huge debts of Greece, Portugal, Italy and Spain have to be rolled over. There will be detailed negotiations on new governance arrangements for the eurozone. The EU’s leaders, who seem to lurch from one crisis summit to the next, will have no capacity left to focus on global challenges.

So all the world’s most powerful leaders will have strong reasons to press “pause” and defer dealing with global challenges. The problem is that history is already playing on fast-forward. The rapid pace of change unleashed by technology and the desire of billions to join the march to modernity mean that we have to adjust faster and faster to all the challenges of living in a small, complex, interdependent world. Hence the demand for global leadership will grow apace in 2012. And no global leader will emerge. It does not take a genius to predict that this is a prescription for continued turbulence and uncertainty.

The writer is dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore and author of ‘The New Asian Hemisphere’

While the financial and business world continue to hang on every twist and turn in eurozone politics, I think the biggest issue for the world in 2012 will be whether China can successfully manage a soft landing.

In recent years, China has become crucial to the world economy: in 2011, it probably added around $1tn in US dollar terms alone, equivalent to creating half of a new Italy. Since the 2008 global credit crisis, each subsequent year in China has had its particular theme: 2009 was about preventing a postcredit crisis collapse and recession; 2010 about controlling the power of the expansion; 2011 about stopping inflation rising too much.

2012 will be all about trying to ensure a soft landing. Growth, under downward pressure from weakening exports and a fall in government-sponsored investment, will have to be led by stronger personal consumption if the economy is to grow by more than 8 per cent.

The rest of the world is increasingly relying on China importing from it, and so helping those economies still suffering hangovers from 2008 to overcome them. With a bit of luck and active decision making, China will pull this off successfully. If not, the switch to new leadership in China will be much more tricky, which will add to the world’s woes.

To succeed, China will need to be able to bring inflation back down to a 3-4 per cent range, and stop the strong price increases of last year reversing into price declines. More stable domestic prices, especially for food, will allow the policy of rising wages to boost real growth in personal incomes: with other targeted policies, it will help the shift to an economy fuelled by stronger, broader growth in domestic consumption.

Let’s hope, for their and all of our sakes, that they pull it off.

The A-List

About this blog Blog guide
Welcome. This blog is available to subscribers only.

The A-List from the Financial Times provides timely, insightful comment on the topics that matter, from globally renowned leaders, policymakers and commentators.

Read the A-List author biographies

Subscribe to the RSS feed

To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

See the full list of FT blogs.

What we’re writing about

Afghanistan Asia maritime tensions carbon central banks China climate change Crimea emerging markets energy EU European Central Bank George Osborne global economy inflation Japan Pakistan quantitative easing Russia Rwanda security surveillance Syria technology terrorism UK Budget UK economy Ukraine unemployment US US Federal Reserve US jobs Vladimir Putin


Africa America Asia Britain Business China Davos Europe Finance Foreign Policy Global Economy Latin America Markets Middle East Syria World


« Nov Jan »December 2011