Daily Archives: March 5, 2012

This year’s session of the National People’s Congress takes on added significance with the impending anointment of the next generation of senior leaders. China would seem to have many reasons to be self-satisfied given the strong prospects for a “soft landing”, a mountain of foreign assets that Europe is eager to tap, and an expanding regional presence that the US has had to take notice of.

Yet the leadership recognises that the country faces daunting economic, social and environmental challenges including vulnerabilities created by past excessive credit expansion. Wen Jiabao, China’s premier, warned on Monday that growth is set to slow this year. It is aiming for a 7.5 per cent rise in gross domestic product, the first time since 2004 that the annual target has dropped below 8 per cent.

But these are likely to be seen as technicalities among those gathered in Beijing. Far more worrisome for the political elite is the question of how to deal with rising social unrest. This was underscored by the global attention given to the Wukan village land-related protests that pushed provincial leaders to support more open local elections. Other disturbances such as last year’s strikes by truck drivers in Shanghai and recent unrest by migrant workers at Foxconn reflect the tensions stemming from decades of widening social inequality that seems out of place for a regime that originated from egalitarian ideals.

For all of China’s economic successes – which lifted some 600m out of poverty – income disparities nevertheless have ratcheted up with the gini coefficient now at 0.47 compared with around 0.25 in the mid-1980s. This has fostered a sense that the system is uncaring, and that opportunities are now being determined by one’s status rather than initiatives.

There is a strong link between the growth in social unrest and the reality that the reform process launched by Deng Xiaoping three decades ago has stalled. Rising social tensions come broadly from two forces, namely limitations of China’s national budget and banking systems in addressing distributional needs and distortions arising from controls over use of land and labour.

A key weakness of the process of economic liberalisation is its failure to provide the fiscal means for the authorities to limit inequalities that came with rapid growth. China’s banking system – which is unique in handling a large share of the financing of public services that would normally go through the budget – accentuates these problems.

The unusually limited role that the national budget plays in supporting expenditures makes it difficult to respond to rising expectations, particularly for an economy where the state controls the bulk of resources. The budget as a proportion of the size of the economy is only two-thirds that of other middle income countries, and half that of European Union. As a consequence, welfare spending has been inadequate, amounting to around half the level (as a share of GDP) of comparable countries.

Rather than strengthening its fiscal system, Beijing relies on its banks to fund much of the growing demand for infrastructure. This has led to episodes of expanded lending to local governments, which (due to concerns regarding repayment) has skewed credit in favour of better off localities and towards the larger state enterprises, rather than private small-scale operators.

Thus the ability to make redistributive transfers (handled elsewhere either by decentralised budgets or through the quasi-fiscal expenditures of banks) has not been available.

No segment of society feels these social pressures more than the 250m migrant workers who do not have access to the same services and employment choices as established residents. As a younger generation without the pre-reform poverty experience matures, their semi-indentured status no longer matches their aspirations in a modernising China. Even with real wage increases of 10-15 per cent annually, increasing numbers of migrants have either returned to their native provinces or increased their demands for more rights.

Migration pressures are also linked to the frequent disputes over land. This reflects the failure to clarify use rights and establish more transparent and equitable transfer systems since all land is formally owned by the state. Local authorities are starved of much needed revenues in the absence of structured property taxes that could serve as the fulcrum for their revenue base. Thus they have been forced to sell off land use rights to balance their budgets. By under paying owners and charging premiums to developers, local bureaucrats are able to capture countless multiples of what they originally paid. The process offers considerable opportunities for corruption and thus weakens trust at community levels. This accounts for some of the more contentious acts of social protest as in Wukan.

If the incoming senior leadership wants to deal with the issues that have spawned rising social unrest, it needs to rethink some of the unintended consequences of its current growth-driven model. Paramount is to reshape China’s economic institutions and control over basic resources in ways that moderate, rather than exacerbate, disparities.

The writer is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment and a former World Bank country director in China

As it begins the search for a new president of the World Bank, the Obama White House risks repeating the very same mistakes that all too often in the past have led to the wrong person being appointed.

Every time this process begins, those in charge ponderously – and mendaciously – announce it will be “open, transparent and merit-based”. They know this is not true, as some of the best candidates are automatically disqualified: only US citizens connected to the occupant of the White House at the time are considered and the process is closed, and only tenuously determined by merit.

The reason is, as is well known (and regularly and futilely derided), that leadership selection for the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund is based on a shameful colonial arrangement whereby the bank’s boss is always American and the IMF’s always European. And this will not change until new powers, such as China, India or Brazil agree to join forces to end it – which is not on the cards for now.

So how might this flawed process be reformed? In the past, it has led to the appointment of candidates who knew little about the bank. The consequences were confusion over its mission and obstacles in the way of providing assistance to countries in need. This is partly the result of the fact that those in charge of making – or influencing – the decision often base it on wrong notions about the ideal background of the Bank’s president. For example:

1. The World Bank is a bank and thus its leader should be a banker. No! The Bank is more than a bank. It is a consulting company for developing countries, a multilateral organisation, an intensely political entity as well as a highly technical one. Its role as an international lending bank is declining relative to its advisory role.

2. Its leader needs to be a politician with access to the US President and a stellar Rolodex. No! Being chums with the president and other heavyweights of course helps. But just having access to power without also having a vision for the institution has been disastrous. The World Bank is first and foremost a development agency that tries to foster change in poor countries, a mission that is difficult for experienced hands and impossible for the inexperienced. Hoping for “on-the-job-training” for appointees with scant experience in development has been a common mistake that has cost the bank, its clients and shareholders dearly.

3. The candidate needs to be a development expert. No! Academics and development experts may be good at understanding the challenges and perhaps even recommending smart solutions. But unless they are proven, effective managers of complex, public-sector-like systems they will fail. If vision and knowledge are not backed up by good managing skills a tenure ends in failure. In this case you have to know how to get a large, culturally heterogeneous, technically sophisticated and, at times, recalcitrant bureaucracy to move in the direction you set.

4. It’s a multilateral organisation and so the head needs to be a diplomat. No! An instinctive diplomacy is critical of course, but few diplomats are sufficiently versed in economics, public finance and the other technical fields on which the bank’s core competence rests.

5. The bank is a global institution and it needs the CEO of a large multinational corporation. No! The bank is indeed an international institution, but its natural habitat – and the skills needed to survive and thrive in it – are closer to those found in a well-run public sector than in the private sector.

So, does all this means that only a superhuman can be successful? No. It means that Mr Obama should look for a professional who already knows this field, its ideas, players and traps, who has a vision for the World Bank rooted in practical experience with development and who has already run successfully a global organisation. This is not the time nor the place for “on-the-job-training”. Nor for paying back political favours.

The writer is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, is a former minister of trade and industry in Venezuela and executive director of the World Bank

The A-List

About this blog Blog guide
Welcome. This blog is available to subscribers only.

The A-List from the Financial Times provides timely, insightful comment on the topics that matter, from globally renowned leaders, policymakers and commentators.

Read the A-List author biographies

Subscribe to the RSS feed

To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

See the full list of FT blogs.

What we’re writing about

Afghanistan Asia maritime tensions carbon central banks China climate change Crimea emerging markets energy EU European Central Bank George Osborne global economy inflation Japan Pakistan quantitative easing Russia Rwanda security surveillance Syria technology terrorism UK Budget UK economy Ukraine unemployment US US Federal Reserve US jobs Vladimir Putin


Africa America Asia Britain Business China Davos Europe Finance Foreign Policy Global Economy Latin America Markets Middle East Syria World


« Feb Apr »March 2012