Iran and the bomb

The new US intelligence report on Iran is clearly a bit of a blow to those pressing for military action against Iranian nuclear facilities. As the FT explained this morning: "The key finding in the estimate, the product of more than 18 months of work by the 16 US intelligence agencies, is that Iran is probably not actively seeking to turn nuclear material into weapons."

You might expect that the only people who would be depressed by this news would be the hawks around Dick Cheney. But you would be wrong. I spent a bit of time today with some British policymakers who follow Iran and counter-proliferation closely. And they are not exactly jumping for joy.

Specifically, the Brits are very worried that efforts to push through a new sanctions package against Iran will now be much harder. And they still think further sanctions are justified. Their argument is that even if Iran is not actively trying to "weaponise" uranium (and the non-proliferation people did not seem convinced, even by this) we should not conclude that they are not pursuing nuclear weapons. They argue that the key point is that Iran has an active uranium enrichment programme, which can only be explained as part of a nuclear-weapons programme. And they also point to Iran’s ballistic-missiles programme as further reason for concern.

Leading Democrats in the US are now calling for a policy of dialogue with Iran. The doves in Europe – led by the Germans – are expected to take a similar line. But my British interlocutors today were not convinced. They are not in favour of bombing (the Cheney option) and they do believe in talking to Iran – at some point. But they want to negotiate when Iran is feeling nervous and on the defensive, not when the hardliners in Iran are feeling confident and vindicated. A further concern is that the US intelligence report will play into the hands of President Ahmadi-nejad, who will be able to argue that Iran has faced down the world and humiliated its adversaries. Conversely, those in Iran who might be arguing for concessions on their nuclear programme, will now be weakened.

The World

with Gideon Rachman

About this blog About Gideon Blog guide
Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs.

Gideon became chief foreign affairs columnist for the Financial Times in July 2006. He joined the FT after a 15-year career at The Economist, which included spells as a foreign correspondent in Brussels, Washington and Bangkok. He also edited The Economist’s business and Asia sections.

His particular interests include American foreign policy, the European Union and globalisation
To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact gideon.rachman@ft.com about The World blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The FT’s Brussels blog

For views and opinions on the European Union from Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal, follow the FT's Brussels blog here.

Tags

2012 US presidential election arab spring Argentina austerity Bahrain bailout Berlusconi chile China Cuba David Cameron Davos drugs ECB EFSF Egypt EU Europe European Commission Eurozone Eurozone crisis France Fukushima Gaddafi Germany Greece IMF Iran Italy Japan Klaus Schwab Libya Live blog Merkel Middle East protests Obama Papandreou Rick Perry Romney Sarkozy Syria Tahrir square US election WEF World Economic Forum

The blog day by day

« Nov Jan »December 2007
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31