Does the resignation of Admiral William Fallon as head of CentCom mean that the “war party” is back in control of American policy to Iran?
I doubt it’s quite that simple. From what we know both the secretaries of state and defence – Rice and Gates – are opposed to an attack. But there is no doubt that fallon was a key member of the “peace party”.
I met him at the IISS conference in Bahrain late last year, just after the US had published the famous NIE report that appeared to debunk the idea that Iran is building nuclear weapons. Fallon was cock-a-hoop. He was keen to underline what a fundamental re-assessment this was and how “wrong”, in his eyes, previous intelligence reports had been.
It could be that Fallon is resigning for reasons other than Iran. He is said to be a difficult guy to work with. All the same, I would say that the odds of an attack on Iran before the end of the Bush administration, have just gone up.
For views and opinions on the European Union from Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal, follow the 