So much for European unity

So far, the European Union’s response to the world financial rule crisis has followed my first rule of EU politics. In a crisis, European unity quickly shatters. It happened over Iraq; it happened over the Balkans – and now it’s happening over the banks.

The Irish were the first to jump the gun, with their blanket guarantee for national banks. But the German reaction was more surprising. Normally, the Germans are the first to lecture others about the need to put Europe first. Yet here was the Merkel government – apparently making bold unilateral guarantees to German savers - just hours after a European summit had broken up. The fact that the moves were subsequently qualified (or withdrawn?) only accentuates the impression of panic.

There are lots of reasons why EU countries start behaving like this when the going gets tough. First, in a crisis people tend to get selfish. It is easy to be high-minded, when nothing very serious is at stake. Second, EU countries often have very different instinctive reactions, whether it is to the US or to international finance – and, in a crisis, people tend to fall back on gut instincts. But the whole episode poses big long-term questions, which I would like to canvass opinion on – since I may write my column about this next week.

First, long-term – is this good or bad for European unity? My instinct is that it has to be bad – a crisis has driven EU countries apart. But, as Tony Barber blogs, there is a well-established Brussels theory that European unity only ever advances in response to a crisis.

Second – a more focussed version of question one. What are the implications for the euro? Eurosceptics have long argued that Europe’s currency union could fall apart. Will this crisis put it under strain? Or will it force the Europeans to update the governance of the euro-zone? And what of all the existing rules on state aid, the stability pact etc…Are they all going to be ripped up or rewritten?

Third – a more focussed version of question two: (I like this Russian doll structure) What does a government guarantee to national banks even mean in a currency union? The Irish government does not control the printing presses and so cannot print euros to re-fund depositors. Presumably, they would have to sell Irish government bonds. Easy enough for them, perhaps, given low levels of government debt. But let’s see the Italians try the same trick.

The World

with Gideon Rachman

About this blog About Gideon Blog guide
Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs. Read more on the authors.

Gideon became chief foreign affairs columnist for the Financial Times in July 2006. He joined the FT after a 15-year career at The Economist, which included spells as a foreign correspondent in Brussels, Washington and Bangkok. He also edited The Economist’s business and Asia sections.

His particular interests include American foreign policy, the European Union and globalisation
To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact gideon.rachman@ft.com about The World blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

FT World News page

Read FT world news coverage from our network of international correspondents.

The FT’s Brussels blog

For views and opinions on the European Union from Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal, follow the FT's Brussels blog here.

Tags

The blog day by day

« Sep Nov »October 2008
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031