Pros and cons of conferences

When I started as an FT foreign-affairs columnist, I told myself that I wouldn’t spend too much time going to conferences. I don’t know quite what I envisaged myself doing instead – working, perhaps? Sitting in monk-like contemplation in a library? Going undercover in the tribal areas of Pakistan?

Anyway, I’m not doing very well on my “avoid conferences” rule. I spent the weekend at Ditchley in the English countryside, conferring about the future of the European Union. And I am currently in residence at Schloss Leopoldskron – an Austrian castle where they filmed the “Sound of Music”. I’m a guest of the Salzburg Global Seminar. We are discussing – let me just look at this folder – yes, we are discussing: “The United States in the World: New Strategies of Engagement”. Later next week, I may re-surface in Texas at yet another conference.

There are legitimate reasons to be suspiscious of the conference circuit. Spending your time in country houses and castles is perhaps a little too comfortable. You can discuss the causes of global poverty or conflict, without ever feeling too upset – and the food and drink are free. You also tend to see the same faces. I was not entirely surprised to encounter Lord David Hannay (author and former British ambassador to the UN) at both Ditchley and Salzburg. (Perhaps he will be in Texas, too?)

Conferences can also be brilliant ways of re-enforcing the conventional wisdom – defining both the questions and the answers.  There were no real Eurosceptics at the Ditchley conference on the European Union. (I made a feeble effort to fulfil the role.) I haven’t met anyone in Salzburg who regrets the election of Obama.

So what’s the point? Well, aside from the sybaritic side, they can be very efficient ways of getting a sense of the debate on any given issue and meeting a lot of interesting people in one go, and exchanging information and gossip. At Ditchley, I found myself sitting next to the State Department official who had been sent on an emergency mission to Georgia, when the Russian tanks were moving in. Here in Salzburg, I’ve just done a session on the Middle East with Hanan Ashrawi – and met various people who deal with issues I follow: a German diplomat who told me all about the state of their debate on Afghanistan, a trade negotiator who told me what had happened to the Doha round.

So it really is work. Promise.

The World

with Gideon Rachman

About this blog About Gideon Blog guide
Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs.

Gideon became chief foreign affairs columnist for the Financial Times in July 2006. He joined the FT after a 15-year career at The Economist, which included spells as a foreign correspondent in Brussels, Washington and Bangkok. He also edited The Economist’s business and Asia sections.

His particular interests include American foreign policy, the European Union and globalisation
To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact gideon.rachman@ft.com about The World blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The FT’s Brussels blog

For views and opinions on the European Union from Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal, follow the FT's Brussels blog here.

Tags

2012 US presidential election arab spring Argentina austerity Bahrain bailout Berlusconi chile China Cuba David Cameron Davos drugs ECB EFSF Egypt EU Europe European Commission Eurozone Eurozone crisis France Fukushima Gaddafi Germany Greece IMF Iran Italy Japan Klaus Schwab Libya Live blog Merkel Middle East protests Obama Papandreou Rick Perry Romney Sarkozy Syria Tahrir square US election WEF World Economic Forum

The blog day by day

« Oct Dec »November 2008
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930