Questions about Gaza

I am on holiday this week. This has the advantage, from my point of view, of meaning that I didn’t have to write a newspaper column on Gaza for yesterday’s FT. It is a depressing subject - to put it mildly. And it is hard to find anything to say about the Israel-Palestine conflict that is either original or constructive.

But my respite will not last. I am back at work next week. And given the likelihood that the fighting will still be going on, I may be writing about Gaza.

So while the world appeals for a ceasefire, let me appeal for some insights from blog-readers. I realise that this too might be a foolhardy endeavour since – in the past – discussions on this subject have tended to bring out the worst in everyone. If this particular thread degenerates into abuse, we will just shut it down. Anyway, here are my questions:

Israel says that it has only one goal: to shut down the missile attacks from Gaza. Is this true?

If Israel has other goals, what might they be?

Is Israel likely to achieve its goals, stated or unstated?

What unintended consequences is Israel’s attack on Gaza likely to have – particularly in the rest of the region?

What are we to make of the world’s reaction to the bombing of Gaza? It struck me as rather milder and more sympathetic than I anticipated. Is this because the major powers at the UN and the Quartet -in particular, Russia and the US – want to maintain the freedom to take similar military actions themselves, whether in Chechnya, Georgia or Pakistan? Or just that countries accept Israel’s argument that it had no option but to defend its citizens and are reluctant to say that the Israeli reaction is disproportionate?

But some people tell me that I’m wrong and that, in fact, the international calls for restraint from Israel have come much quicker than they did during the Lebanon war of 2006. One FT colleague reckons that one part of the international reaction that Israel may not have anticipated has been the panic on the part of the Arab governments that the Israelis believed would give their tacit support for an attack on Hamas – Egypt, in particular, but also the Saudis. The Egyptians are very worried that the Muslim Brotherhood, closely connected to Hamas, will get a surge of domestic support as a result of Israeli actions in Gaza.

I await your reactions with trepidation. Oh, and happy New Year.

The World

with Gideon Rachman

About this blog About Gideon Blog guide
Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs. Read more on the authors.

Gideon became chief foreign affairs columnist for the Financial Times in July 2006. He joined the FT after a 15-year career at The Economist, which included spells as a foreign correspondent in Brussels, Washington and Bangkok. He also edited The Economist’s business and Asia sections.

His particular interests include American foreign policy, the European Union and globalisation
To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact gideon.rachman@ft.com about The World blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

FT World News page

Read FT world news coverage from our network of international correspondents.

The FT’s Brussels blog

For views and opinions on the European Union from Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal, follow the FT's Brussels blog here.

Tags

arab spring Argentina austerity bailout Barack Obama Berlusconi Bo Xilai Brussels China Colombia Cuba Davos ECB EFSF Egypt EU Europe European Commission Eurozone Eurozone crisis Fidel Castro France François Hollande Greece Hugo Chavez IMF In the Picture Iran Italy Klaus Schwab Live blog Merkel Nicolas Sarkozy Papademos Papandreou Putin Rick Perry Romney Sarkozy Spain Syria US election Venizelos WEF World Economic Forum

The blog day by day

« Nov Jan »December 2008
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031