Restricting free speech in Britain

I was brought up to believe that Speakers Corner in Hyde Park encapsulate all that is best about Britain. Here is a country where liberty is so ingrained that anybody can turn up, mount a soapbox and give a speech. Of course, in reality, Speakers Corner is a bit of a disappointment. Many of the speakers are lunatics or religious fundamentalists. Still, it’s the thought that counts.

The British government, however, seems increasingly at odds with the notion of freedom of speech. It has taken to banning all manner of foreigners from entering the country, on the grounds that they are promoting offensive or dangerous views. I blogged earlier this year about the decision to exclude Geert Wilders, a Dutch politician who wants to ban the Koran. Now a ban has been issued against Michael Savage, a right-wing American talk-show host – who also has a record of baiting Muslims. Mr Savage has also said offensive things about autistic children – which, amazingly enough, Labour MPs have cited as partial justification for his exclusion. But as Catherine Bennett shows in an excellent column in today’s Observer, it is very hard to argue that Mr Savage is a genuine danger to public order.

Bennett suggests, plausibly enough, that the likes of Wilders and Savage are being excluded from Britain in the search for some sort of politically-correct balance. The government has banned some extremist Islamist preachers and deported others; so it may feel the need to be seen to act against promoters of “Islamaphobia”. This is in danger of becoming simultaneously absurd and dangerous. So here is a better idea. The government should be much more restrained about who it excludes. Racist or offensive views should not be any justification for denying foreigners entry – where would you stop? The only justification for an exclusion should be if a foreigner poses a clear danger to the people of Britain; for example, by encouraging terrorism.

And if a few dangerous radicals make it past immigration – so what? I prefer the Britain that played host to Marx and Bakunin, to the fearful and politically-correct country of today.

The World

with Gideon Rachman

About this blog About Gideon Blog guide
Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs. Read more on the authors.

Gideon became chief foreign affairs columnist for the Financial Times in July 2006. He joined the FT after a 15-year career at The Economist, which included spells as a foreign correspondent in Brussels, Washington and Bangkok. He also edited The Economist’s business and Asia sections.

His particular interests include American foreign policy, the European Union and globalisation
To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact gideon.rachman@ft.com about The World blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

FT World News page

Read FT world news coverage from our network of international correspondents.

The FT’s Brussels blog

For views and opinions on the European Union from Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal, follow the FT's Brussels blog here.

The blog day by day

« Apr Jun »May 2009
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031