Will Iran sanctions work?

It is always dangerous to confuse diplomatic progress with real progress. I don’t mean to denigrate the work of the western diplomats who have toiled for months to put together a new package of sanctions on Iran. In purely diplomatic terms, it was a formidable achievement to get a new UN resolution through today. Although a lot of attention has focussed on the fact that Turkey and Brazil voted against the resolution – an interesting development, to be sure - I think the more significant fact is that all five permanent members of the Security Council voted in favour. It has taken a lot of haggling and persuasion to get the Chinese and the Russians on board.

Inevitably, however, the price of unanimity was to water down the resolution. Western diplomats think that it was worth it. Obviously, a Russian or Chinese veto would have meant no sanctions at all. It is hoped that getting Moscow and Beijing actually to vote in favour will send a powerful signal of international unity to Tehran.

But will it be enough to persuade the Iranians to slow work on their nuclear programme, or even abandon it altogether? I have always been sceptical about this. It seems to me that the prestige of the Iranian government is now so closely tied up with the nuclear programme that it would take something really enormous to persuade them to take a different path. The package agreed at the UN falls far short of the “crippling” sanctions that Hillary Clinton once called for. In particular, there is no effort to target Iran’s energy industry – a measure that might really damage the economy.

However, some of the people involved in the diplomatic effort, seem more hopeful that sanctions might yet work. One European diplomat argues that – “The Iranian regime is under huge economic pressure already. They’re running through their reserves. They are suffering from shortages and high unemployment. They know they are deeply unpopular. These sanctions with ratchet up the pressure further. They could work, if we just don’t become defeatist and start talking about containing a nuclear Iran.”

I’m not sure I’m convinced. But here’s hoping.

The World

with Gideon Rachman

About this blog About Gideon Blog guide
Gideon Rachman and his FT colleagues debate international affairs. Read more on the authors.

Gideon became chief foreign affairs columnist for the Financial Times in July 2006. He joined the FT after a 15-year career at The Economist, which included spells as a foreign correspondent in Brussels, Washington and Bangkok. He also edited The Economist’s business and Asia sections.

His particular interests include American foreign policy, the European Union and globalisation
To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact gideon.rachman@ft.com about The World blog.

See the full list of FT blogs.

FT World News page

Read FT world news coverage from our network of international correspondents.

The FT’s Brussels blog

For views and opinions on the European Union from Peter Spiegel, Joshua Chaffin, Alex Barker and Stanley Pignal, follow the FT's Brussels blog here.

Tags

The blog day by day

« May Jul »June 2010
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930