Tuesday Oct 7 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

November 6, 2007

Do immigrants raise or lower wages?

The idea that "immigrants take our jobs" has always been ridiculous to economists, or anyone who thinks seriously about how an economy works. (If a million people migrate to the UK, who is going to sell them food and clothes, build them houses, teach their children? When the population is larger there is more demand for workers.)
However, the idea that immigrants lower the wages of native workers is not at all ridiculous. I speculated in "The Undercover Economist" that the NHS was a low-cost operation in part because of its willingness to employ migrant nurses and doctors to keep costs down. The economist George Borjas (now blogging) argues that low-skilled migrants to the US help to depress the wages of low-skilled natives. That is reasonable.
But it may be wrong. The mix of new skills may complement the existing demography well; it may also encourage new capital investment. It is fair to say that economists do not really agree.
The latest contribution is from Gianmarco Ottaviano and Giovanni Peri, arguing that immigration raises native wages and (less surprisingly) rents:

In this paper we document a strong positive correlation of immigration flows with changes in average wages and average house rents for native residents across U.S. states… the correlations are compatible with a causal interpretation from immigration to wages and rents of natives.

The paper is here.

One Response to “Do immigrants raise or lower wages?”

Comments

  1. So immigrants with the same skills as natives lower wages, while immigrants with new skills for growing sectors do not?

    The NHS has been looking abroad for workers ever since Enoch Powell - and does it mainly to meet skills shortages rather than to keep wages artificially low.

    The last Tory government cut doctor training programmes. As a result, when Labour increased funding the only way to employ enough doctors to meet voters’ expectations was to recruit abroad.

    Also, British doctors refuse to work in areas like the S.Wales valleys, creating more demand for immigrant medics.

    Posted by: dave | November 6th, 2007 at 4:05 pm | Report this comment

Post a comment

Comment Policy




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • Gadget GuruThe FT's personal technology expert Paul Taylor answers your gadgetry questions

  • Margaret McCartney's blogA forum by GP and FT opinion columnist on healthcare issues

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business