Love plus one

Ruth_3 I neglected to alert y’all to Monday’s More or Less – which covered quants and the credit crunch, extreme weather and climate change, a 20-year old from Birmingham who solved an international mathematical puzzle – but you can download a podcast if you like.
Particularly recommended was Ruth Alexander’s experience in trying to find love using a dating algorithm:

First of all, the website invites me to answer a long questionnaire. How much reassurance do I need from a partner? How much do I give to charity? How tidy is my home?
"The majority of questions represent statements commonly heard by therapists in couples counselling," says True.com psychologist, Dr Garth Bellah.
The website then uses what statisticians call a regression equation to determine what sort of person I would be best matched with, according to my character and how that fits with historical data about other people’s relationships.
The company says it’s identified 99 distinct factors found in successful relationships. Another dating site says there are 29 – its mathematical match-making is based on research it says it’s done on 10,000 married couples.
Looking at the profiles of the men the computer highlighted for me, I was highly sceptical, bordering on horrified. But I gritted my teeth and sent a flurry of e-mails: would you like to go on a date with me and my microphone?
It turns out the compatibility test doesn’t yet measure aversion to journalists. Only two people e-mailed back – and one of those dumped me for someone else before we’d even met.
So I was left with one chance of love. And he was wearing a burgundy bow-tie and waistcoat. But our compatibility score was 94%. The computer said yes.

This was terrific radio. A fair test of the dating algorithm? No.
We were put onto the scent by Ian Ayres, author of Supercrunchers. He thinks that algorithms can do a better job than, say, friends, in finding a good love match. I am persuadable, but not convinced that the current products – which are confidential black boxes – actually do the job.
Here’s an alternative take on the maths of dating, in which I point out that we tend to adjust quickly to "market conditions" in accepting potential dates. More on that in The Logic of Life.

The Undercover Economist: a guide

Publishing schedule: Excerpts from "The Undercover Economist" and "Dear Economist", Tim's weekly columns for the FT Magazine, are published on this blog on Saturday mornings.
More about Tim: Tim also writes editorials for the FT, presents Radio 4's More or Less and is the author of "The Undercover Economist" and "The Logic of Life".
Comment: To comment, please register with FT.com, which you can do for free here. Please also read our comments policy here.
Contact: Tim's contact address is: economist@ft.com
Time: UK time is shown on posts.
Follow: A link to the blog's RSS feeds is at the top of the page.
Follow on Twitter
FT blogs: See the full range of the FT's blogs here.