Friday Aug 8 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

February 27, 2008

Belated Singapore fact of the day

I was in Singapore last week, promoting The Logic of Life. One feature of the book that some reviewers have picked up on is that the book contains a thoughtful, rigorous and (in my opinion) decorous few pages on the economics of oral sex. It was only as my interview schedule was nearly finished that the publicist said, “by the way, oral sex is illegal in Singapore“.

Hm. Fascinating. And it would have been nice to be told before commencing the tour of Singapore.

4 Responses to “Belated Singapore fact of the day”

Comments

  1. It isn’t - s377 of the Penal Code was replaced in October last year. And it was legal as an act leading to intercourse in any case.

    So whatever you got up to in Geylang was probably legal. Unless it was with another man, in which case it would fall foul of s377a…

    Posted by: Wowbagger | February 28th, 2008 at 4:03 am | Report this comment
  2. […] Tim Harford gave a very engaging talk at Melbourne Business School today to a full house. It is great to see so many students interested in economics that they would voluntarily come to a lunchtime lecture. It bodes well for the world. Also, it looks like Tim didn’t run into the kinds of difficulties that he did with his material in Singapore. […]

    Posted by: CoreEcon » Blog Archive » Tim Harford at MBS | February 28th, 2008 at 4:09 am | Report this comment
  3. he didn’t run into any kind of trouble at all. the law was abandoned some time ago. it is left on the books merely to pacify the “moral majority”. not enforced

    Posted by: John Smith | February 28th, 2008 at 7:12 am | Report this comment
  4. 377a, which criminalizes sex acts between homosexual men, is not actively enforced. It’s more of a marker as to the conservative nature of Singaporean society. It’s probably best not to test it too overtly, though.

    At the time of the replacement of s377 (it’s not ‘left on the books’ - 377 is now an entirely different offence relating to molesting cadavers), there was a lively debate in Parliament and in the press as to the merits, suggested by the SG govt, of repealing 377a as well.

    Ultimately, the majority of Singaporeans didn’t want 377a repealed and it wasn’t.

    Posted by: Wowbagger | February 29th, 2008 at 3:27 am | Report this comment

Post a comment

Comment Policy




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • Gadget GuruThe FT's personal technology expert Paul Taylor answers your gadgetry questions

  • Margaret McCartney's blogA forum by GP and FT opinion columnist on healthcare issues

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Westminster Blog By our UK Parliament writers

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business