How to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

Gib Metcalf and four co-authors write:

First, a low starting tax rate combined with a low rate of growth in the tax rate will not reduce emissions significantly. Second, the costs of GHG reductions are reduced with the inclusion of non-CO2 gases in the carbon tax scheme.  Third, welfare costs of the policies can be affected by the rate of growth of the tax, even after controlling for cumulative emissions.  Fourth, a carbon tax — like any form of carbon pricing — is regressive. However, general equilibrium considerations suggest that the short-run measured regressivity may be overstated.  Additionally, the regressivity can be offset with a carefully designed rebate of some or all of the revenue.  Finally, the carbon tax bills that have been proposed or submitted are for the most part comparable to many of the carbon cap-and-trade proposals that have been suggested.  Thus the choice between a carbon tax and cap-and-trade system can be made on the basis of considerations other than their effectiveness at reducing emissions over some control period.

That sounds sensible. The difference between cap-and-trade and a carbon tax is much exaggerated.

Tim Harford’s blog

This blog is no longer updated but it remains open as an archive.

Tim, also known as the Undercover Economist, writes about the economics of everyday life.