Monday Oct 6 2008
All times are London time

Search Quotes in the FT.com site
FT Logo

July 28, 2008

If this is a union victory I would hate to see them lose

As early as May we were reporting some of the big demands from unions such as Unite and GMB from the Labour national policy forum - which ended yesterday.

How many did they actually get? Hardly anything, despite the OTT headlines this morning.

Sieve through the promises and most are either vague (greater commitment to in-house hospital cleaners) or reheated (extending parental leave). The one relatively concrete change, a lowering of the adult minimum wage from 22 to 21, has been suggested before by the Low Pay Commission and - even now - is not definite. Nor will it cost business a fortune to implement.

Here are some of the things that unions didn’t win:

* A change in the ballot process to make industrial action less prone to end up in the courts

* A windfall tax on fuel companies

* A change in the law to make secondary action easier

* A rise in the National Insurance ceiling

* An end to the privatisation of the welfare state

* Free meals in primary schools (councils have been ‘invited’ to look at a pilot in Hull)

Last week the Tories claimed that the unions had bought influence over Labour through their massive donations to the party. Unless there are secret deals still to emerge, that doesn’t look the case.

UPDATE:

I’ve just read through the whole detailed 25-page agreement. Some of the language won’t go down well with the comrades…

eg…”we will continue to use voluntary and community organisations, social enterprises and the independent sector in providing (public) services”….”allowing real choice means that patients, and the NHS, can act on these preferences. So we will take choice further…in other areas of healthcare including maternity services and general practice.”

One Response to “If this is a union victory I would hate to see them lose”

Comments

  1. […] the FT said “If this is a union victory I would hate to see them lose“. Here’s what they didn’t get: * A change in the ballot process to make […]

    Posted by: No Warwick 2 « Rebellion Sucks! = a blog for socialism & self-determination | July 30th, 2008 at 2:15 am | Report this comment

Post a comment

Comment Policy




As a final step before posting the comment, please type the two words you see in the image beloweight numbers in the audio clip; this test is to prevent automated robots from posting comments.


More FT Blogs and Forums

  • Economists' Forum Leading economists and the FT's chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, debate the big issues

  • Gideon Rachman's blog The FT's chief foreign affairs commentator on world issues and his travels

  • Gadget GuruThe FT's personal technology expert Paul Taylor answers your gadgetry questions

  • Margaret McCartney's blogA forum by GP and FT opinion columnist on healthcare issues

  • Brussels Blog By our Brussels writers

  • Clive Crook's blog The FT's chief Washington commentator blogs about intersection of politics and economics

  • The Undercover Economist Tim Harford's blog on economics in everyday life

  • Willem Buiter's Maverecon The LSE professor blogs on 'economics, politics, ethics, religion, culture, free and open source software (FOSS), and whatever'

  • John Gapper's blog FT chief business commentator talks about business, finance, media and technology

  • Management Blog A forum for the latest thinking about the issues that preoccupy managers around the world

  • FT Alphaville Instant market news and commentary for finance professionals

  • Dear Lucy Columnist Lucy Kellaway and readers solve your workplace woes

  • FT Tech Blog Our San Francisco and world correspondents look at the intersection of technology and business