Should the councils have kept their money in Icelandic banks?

Hindsight is a glorious thing. Of course. But there were plenty of signs that Icelandic banks were heading towards…pardon the pun….an iceberg.

The entire country had been widely compared to a giant hedge fund, given its penchant for debt. And back in March the cost of protecting Kaupthing and Landsbanki’s bonds (via credit default swaps) rose sharply.

Police authorities and councils say they couldn’t have known what would happen next. When they put deposits in the three Icelandic banks – which were all nationalised this week – the ratings agencies were giving a broadly positive steer.

That is true to some extent. And yes, this is another example of the agencies only noticing problems when it is far too late. There were few explicit warnings about specific Icelandic banks until their fate was already sealed.

But cynics could have spotted one or two implicit comments in agency reports.

In September, Kaupthing was given a reasonable credit rating of Baa1 by Moody’s on the basis that it would be backed by the Icelandic government.

But the same agency gave it a “bank financial strength rating” of just C-; having downgraded it from C on February 2008. That is far from a big thumbs-up.

UPDATE: I’ve just had a message defending councils and blaming flawed government investment advice.

This is what the Tories want you to think.  In fact, the guidance issued under the Local Government Act of 2003 does not sound reckless.

”The general policy objective is that local authorities should invest prudently the surplus funds held on behalf of their communities,” it says. “The guidance recommends that priority should be given to security and liquidity. However, that does not mean that authorities should ignore yield. It will be appropriate to seek the highest rate of return consistent with the proper levels of security and liquidity.”

The most recent advice from the Metropolitan Police Authority advised forces to “maximise the yield from investments”…but only “consistent with the security and liquidity objectives identified.”

 

Westminster blog

on the UK political scene

About this blog Blog guide
Jim Pickard and Kiran Stacey, FT Westminster correspondents, share the latest news and analysis on the UK's political scene.

Follow the latest news on the UK coalition government.

To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the Westminster blog team: Jim Pickard, Kiran Stacey, Nicholas Timmins, Elizabeth Rigby and Helen Warrell.

The illustrations of Jim and Kiran are by Nick Hardcastle.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The authors

Jim Pickard joined the lobby team in January 2008. He has been at the Financial Times since 1999 as a regional correspondent, assistant UK news editor and property correspondent.

Kiran Stacey is an FT political correspondent, having joined the lobby in 2011. He started at the FT as a graduate trainee in 2008, working on desks including UK companies and US equity markets before taking over the FT's Energy Source blog.

Contributors

Elizabeth Rigby, the FT's chief political correspondent, joined the lobby team in September 2010. Elizabeth has worked at the FT for more than a decade and was most recently its consumer industries editor.

Helen Warrell is the FT's UK reporter, covering home affairs, crime and policing. She joined the FT in 2008 and has spent time as a reporter in the Brussels bureau and more recently, editing the paper's Asia coverage on the world news desk.

Archive

« Sep Nov »October 2008
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031