The MPs pension wheeze

A jubilant taxpayer approaches Sir Rodrick Whitehall after hearing that Gordon Brown has abandoned plans to increase the public contribution to the MPs’ pension pot.

Tim Taxpayer: Hoorah! At last. They’ve seen sense. Even venal MPs realise the public wouldn’t accept stumping up more cash to feather the Westminster pension scheme. We’re making progress!

Sir Roderick Whitehall: I’m pleased you think so.

TT: So how much will this save?

RW: Well. It depends what you mean by “save”.

TT: Do we put in less money into the MPs’ pension pot?

RW: The contribution will be capped.

TT: So now the MPs will have to either contribute more from their salaries or make the scheme less generous. I can already hear the pips squeaking! If they don’t do that the scheme’s deficit would balloon and they’d be unable to fund those lavish retirement benefits. Poor MPs. Isn’t life hard.

RW: Indeed. But this is awfully complex. MPs have said they will look at ways of making up for the cap in the taxpayer contribution. But of course it will take some time to decide how to proceed.

TT: Well, that’s fine by me. It’s their scheme. They can gamble with their futures and starve the pension pot if they want to. Frankly I hope scheme collapses under the weight of their greed.

RW: Ah, well, that would be impossible of course.

TT: What do you mean?

RW: The scheme is guaranteed.

TT: What?

RW: Yes the scheme is guaranteed by the taxpayer. Even if it had no money left in the pot and a deficit the size of…well, a significant overexposure, retired MPs would still be paid from public funds.

TT: So what difference does reducing the taxpayer contribution make?

RW: That is a good question. I like to see it as a sign of intent. And, of course, the MPs would have had a dashed difficult vote today if they had kept the same motion.

TT: Hang on a minute. You mean they expect me to be pleased by the “sacrifice” of not making us pay more money into their scheme? It means nothing! We’re still on the hook for the whole lot.

RW: No need to be so cynical about it. This way is far less painful.

Westminster blog

on the UK political scene

About this blog Blog guide
Jim Pickard and Kiran Stacey, FT Westminster correspondents, share the latest news and analysis on the UK's political scene.

Follow the latest news on the UK coalition government.

To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the Westminster blog team: Jim Pickard, Kiran Stacey, Nicholas Timmins, Elizabeth Rigby and Helen Warrell.

The illustrations of Jim and Kiran are by Nick Hardcastle.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The authors

Jim Pickard joined the lobby team in January 2008. He has been at the Financial Times since 1999 as a regional correspondent, assistant UK news editor and property correspondent.

Kiran Stacey is an FT political correspondent, having joined the lobby in 2011. He started at the FT as a graduate trainee in 2008, working on desks including UK companies and US equity markets before taking over the FT's Energy Source blog.

Contributors

Elizabeth Rigby, the FT's chief political correspondent, joined the lobby team in September 2010. Elizabeth has worked at the FT for more than a decade and was most recently its consumer industries editor.

Helen Warrell is the FT's UK reporter, covering home affairs, crime and policing. She joined the FT in 2008 and has spent time as a reporter in the Brussels bureau and more recently, editing the paper's Asia coverage on the world news desk.

Archive

« May Jul »June 2009
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930