More evidence that AV could help the Tories

Nick Clegg will not be pleased by the latest poll readings

Nick Clegg will not be pleased by the latest poll readings

I blogged here a couple of weeks ago about the possibility that moving to AV could hurt the Lib Dems as it would mean Labour and Conservative voters would no longer vote for them to keep the other big party out.

Part of what triggered that blog was the news that the Tories’ chief whip had shown potential rebels against the AV referendum bill a list of vulnerable MPs should the reform go through. That list was apparently populated by more Lib Dems than Tories.

And the suggestion that the Tories could do well out of AV (contrary to the findings of this poll by YouGov for the Spectator) is backed up by a fresh poll out today by Populus for the Tory peer Lord Ashcroft.

Tim Montgomerie on ConservativeHome blogs Lord Ashcroft’s six main findings:

  1. Labour would gain 16 to 28 Tory-held seats where they are in second place, if the election was held today.
  2. The Liberal Democrats would lose 19 to 30 seats that they currently hold where the Conservatives are second.
  3. The net gains under First Past The Post would be +28 for Labour and +2 for Conservatives.
  4. Under AV the net gains would be +16 for Labour and +3 for the Conservatives.
  5. 21% of the 6,000 voters in the Populus/ Ashcroft poll said that the Liberal Democrats were having a “significant” impact on the Coalition’s policies. 51% said “some” influence. 23% said “virtually no” influence.
  6. In terms of attacking the Coalition Budget there is tactical advice for Labour. By 59% to 39% Labour is losing the argument on timing of cuts with majorities in all categories of marginal seats saying that it is right to start cutting now. Labour would be on much stronger ground if they focused on the impact of cuts on “ordinary hardworking people”. Only 32% of voters think George Osborne’s adjustments are fairly distributed. 64% think “ordinary” families are bearing the brunt of tax rises and cuts.

The heavy losses for the Lib Dems, it should be noted, are not so because of AV but because of a general meltdown in the polls. But if AV doesn’t help give them a much stronger foothold in the Commons, party members might feel their one shot at lasting power has come to nothing.

Westminster blog

on the UK political scene

About this blog Blog guide
Jim Pickard and Kiran Stacey, FT Westminster correspondents, share the latest news and analysis on the UK's political scene.

Follow the latest news on the UK coalition government.

To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the Westminster blog team: Jim Pickard, Kiran Stacey, Nicholas Timmins, Elizabeth Rigby and Helen Warrell.

The illustrations of Jim and Kiran are by Nick Hardcastle.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The authors

Jim Pickard joined the lobby team in January 2008. He has been at the Financial Times since 1999 as a regional correspondent, assistant UK news editor and property correspondent.

Kiran Stacey is an FT political correspondent, having joined the lobby in 2011. He started at the FT as a graduate trainee in 2008, working on desks including UK companies and US equity markets before taking over the FT's Energy Source blog.

Contributors

Nicholas Timmins is public policy commentator, having been the FT's public policy editor from 1996 to 2011. He was a founder member of The Independent and before that he worked for The Times. He is author of "The Five Giants: A Biography of the Welfare State".

Elizabeth Rigby, the FT's chief political correspondent, joined the lobby team in September 2010. Elizabeth has worked at the FT for more than a decade and was most recently its consumer industries editor.

Helen Warrell is the FT's UK reporter, covering home affairs, crime and policing. She joined the FT in 2008 and has spent time as a reporter in the Brussels bureau and more recently, editing the paper's Asia coverage on the world news desk.

Archive

« Jun Aug »July 2010
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031