Daily Archives: November 11, 2010

The IDS welfare white paper is impressive in parts. But it is difficult to work out some of the most basic knock-on effects. After having struggled in vain with the data provided, Ian Mulheirn of the Social Market Foundation looked asked a broader question:

What will happen to the incentives to work of a typical working family between 2010 and 2014, if they moved straight on to Universal Credit?

The answer is they’ll be paying about 6p in the pound extra in tax. It doesn’t quite match today’s rosy political rhetoric. Read more

Iain Duncan Smith just repeatedly “guaranteed” to the Commons that there would be no losers from the introduction of the Universal Credit. But that of course depends on how you define a loser.

This graph makes clear that there will be losers from this benefit reform, at least in terms of entitlements. It hits a relatively well off section of society. But they are losers nonetheless. Read more

David Cameron has announced some genuinely tough penalties for jobseekers who step out of line. But it is no revolution in benefit management. Here are five reasons to take the latest crackdown on the workshy with a big pinch of salt:

1. Sanctions are as old as benefits. The first powers to dock the benefits of the workshy were introduced in the 1913 bill that created Unemployment Benefit. Yes, before the First World War. This “radical” Cameron plan is as old as the welfare state. Read more