Why electricity bills may go up with or without Huhne’s reforms

Chris Huhne this morning criticised a Telegraph headline – suggesting bills would rise by £500 because of his energy reforms – as “ludicrous” and “absolutely bonkers”.

The splash quoted a website called uSwitch predicting that bills would rise per household by £500 from their current average energy bill of £1,157. (Although it’s not clear by when). Huhne said the rise would instead by from £500 per household to £660 by 2030.

The difference can be explained by the fact that the uSwitch figure relates to total energy bills (including gas) whereas Huhne is just talking about electricity, the subject of the review. Both estimates are in real terms, ie before inflation.

Curiously, however, there is not such a massive difference in the proportionate increase. Huhne’s rise amounts to 32 per cent over the period, while USwitch is predicting 42 per cent.

That implies that Huhne is overusing his language somewhat when dismissing the survey in such sweeping terms.

But – and this is where the energy secretary should be heard – his argument is that we don’t know how much bills would go up by without the reforms, which include an implicit carbon tax and new feed-in tariffs which will guarantee a price for new renewable and nuclear power.

The facts are that we don’t know when oil and gas reserves will start to run out; peak oil may or may not be only decades away. Exploitation will become more and more risky in some of the world’s most politically unstable countries. “We don’t want to be in hoc to these sorts of markets,” Huhne pointed out.

Leave aside the issue of global warming, which often over-dominates the debate. The idea that we will be able to buy gas and oil in 2030 at the same price as today – in real terms – is utterly complacent*. Is it time for the media to reflect that more prominently?

* In fact Decc’s current estimate for oil prices in 2020 is $80 a barrel, compared to $85 today, which seems recklessly low.

UPDATE

uSwitch tell me their survey is out of date. It was published in June 2009 and was based by detailed work by Ernst & Young which examined the cost of replacing existing gas and coal plants as well as new low-carbon energy generation. The website has since updated its estimates and believes the reforms will add about £400 to a typical bill of about £1,200. By my calculations that is around 33 per cent – ie the same as Chris Huhne’s predictions.

Westminster blog

on the UK political scene

About this blog Blog guide
Jim Pickard and Kiran Stacey, FT Westminster correspondents, share the latest news and analysis on the UK's political scene.

Follow the latest news on the UK politics and policy.

To comment, please register for free with FT.com and read our policy on submitting comments.

All posts are published in UK time.

Contact the Westminster blog team: Jim Pickard, Kiran Stacey, Nicholas Timmins, Elizabeth Rigby and Helen Warrell.

The illustrations of Jim and Kiran are by Nick Hardcastle.

See the full list of FT blogs.

The authors

Jim Pickard joined the lobby team in January 2008. He has been at the Financial Times since 1999 as a regional correspondent, assistant UK news editor and property correspondent.

Kiran Stacey is an FT political correspondent, having joined the lobby in 2011. He started at the FT as a graduate trainee in 2008, working on desks including UK companies and US equity markets before taking over the FT's Energy Source blog.

Contributors

Elizabeth Rigby, the FT's chief political correspondent, joined the lobby team in September 2010. Elizabeth has worked at the FT for more than a decade and was most recently its consumer industries editor.

Helen Warrell is the FT's UK reporter, covering home affairs, crime and policing. She joined the FT in 2008 and has spent time as a reporter in the Brussels bureau and more recently, editing the paper's Asia coverage on the world news desk.

Archive

« Nov Jan »December 2010
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031