Even on board diversity, men and women can’t agree

As countries around the world set targets to increase the number of women directors in public companies, new research suggests that meeting those goals might be complicated by the fact that male and female board members do not agree on whether board diversity will improve a board’s performance.

According to the research, women and men on corporate boards disagree on the need for quotas and the reasons why fewer women are represented on boards, and whether or not a diverse board matters for good corporate governance.

The research, conducted by Heidrick & Struggles, the executive recruitment group, Women Corporate Directors, an organization made up of women who serve on boards, and Boris Groysberg of the Harvard Business School, was based on survey responses from 721 male and female board members in 26 countries.

Quotas appear to be a particularly divisive topic. Just 13 per cent of men surveyed personally supported quotas; and even among women, the figure was only 41 per cent.

Similarly, while more than half of women (53 per cent) thought quotas were an effective way of increasing board diversity, just 18 per cent of men agreed.

I spoke to Bonnie Gwin, vice-chairwoman and managing partner of Heidrick & Struggles’ North American Board of directors practice, about the findings. She told me:

“One thing that struck me is the increasing percentage of women who seem to support quotas. That is not what I hear when I speak with board members, but it seems as though a number of women are beginning to think that quotas are something to consider. It may be because quotas are part of the dialogue in countries like Norway, France, Spain, and the UK. In the US, they are not part of dialogue about what makes a great board.”

About a third of women directors believe closed-off traditional networks are the main reason more women aren’t considered for director positions. Men, on the other hand, tens to believe that the fact there are fewer women currently in executive leadership roles creates a smaller talent pipeline for entrance into the board room.

Gwin says that one way to remedy this is for companies to “look beyond the CEO level” when they are identifying and recruiting possible board members.

Men and women also hold disparate views on whether increasing the number of women in the boardroom will improve overall board performance.

More than half (55 per cent) of female directors say that three or more women on any board make it a more effective board. Yet only 16 per cent of male directors agree with this. Gwin says this sentiment may have to do with “outside forces dictating” how companies compose their boards.

About three quarters – 76 per cent – of women also believe increased board diversity will be effective in rebuilding trust in boards. This compared with less than half – 42 per cent – of men surveyed.

“In my opinion, diversity of boards is simple: it is good for business. It is a competitive advantage to have a lot of life experiences around the table.”

This blog is no longer updated but it remains open as an archive.

The 'Women at the Top' blog is part of a series of online and print publications that focuses on women's achievements in business. With up-to-date news and incisive analysis, the blog will provoke discussion on the role of the world's most prominent businesswomen. www.ft.com/womenblog

For more Women at the Top news, video interviews and other features, visit www.ft.com/womenatthetop


About our bloggers

Liz Bolshaw

Liz Bolshaw is a business journalist and editor. She has been a successful book publisher, online editor, magazine editor and publisher.

She was launch editor of the Europe-wide online community Entrepreneur Country, has published magazines for PwC, 3i, dunhill and Bafta, and launched The Sharp Edge, a magazine for and about entrepreneurs, with Duncan Bannatyne. She is a regular contributor to Thomson Reuters’ Venture Capital Journal.

Her last project for the Financial Times was as editor of the paper’s Business Education magazine.

Rebecca Knight

Rebecca Knight is a freelance journalist based in Boston. She writes regularly for the FT on business education, entrepreneurship, and management.

Andrew Hill

Andrew Hill is an associate editor and the management editor of the FT. He was City editor of the FT and editor of the daily Lombard column on British business and finance from September 2006 to December 2010.

He was the FT’s financial editor from June 2005 to September 2006, with overall responsibility for coverage of companies and markets. Before becoming financial editor, he was the FT’s comment & analysis editor, in charge of the paper’s opinion and features pages.

From 1999 to 2003, he was the FT’s New York bureau chief. He joined the FT in 1988 and has also worked as foreign news editor, UK companies reporter and correspondent in Brussels and Milan.

Pino Bethencourt

Pino Bethencourt is a professor and leadership expert at IE Business School in Madrid. She is also an author and executive coach.

Lynda Gratton

Lynda Gratton is professor of management practice at London Business School.

Linda Tarr-Whelan

Linda Tarr-Whelan, former ambassador to the UN commission on the status of women, is a Demos distinguished senior fellow.