Tag: quotas

Liz Bolshaw

In Monday’s FT, Lucy Kellaway writes about the impact that she, specifically as a female non-executive director (of Admiral, the FTSE 100 car insurance group), has on her board.

How much does gender deliver diversity? Will a woman inevitably bring a different perspective to the board table than a man, or do we exaggerate the importance of gender in our drive for more heterogeneous management teams? Kellaway goes on to take a tilt at another mantra for increasing female participation at board level: positive role modelling. She writes:

“I don’t kid myself that my own inanely grinning face in the annual report is a good example to bright, ambitious women working in the company on whose board I serve.”

In an article published last year in European Management Review, an international journal, Sabina Nielsen and Morten Huse discussed their research into the contributions made by women directors to board decision-making and strategic involvement at 120 Norwegian companies.

Because Norway has the highest level of participation of women in the boardroom globally, having introduced a 40 per cent quota in 2008, it makes for a useful gender lab.

Broadly, the researchers found it was not gender as such that underpinned women’s different perspectives, but rather the varied professional experience and value systems they tended to bring to the boardroom. More women than men in the research sample had higher degrees and non-business backgrounds. They were less likely than men to tolerate ethical lapses such as insider trading.

Most of them held, like Kellaway, non-executive roles, and those who were executive directors tended to be in “soft” areas such as human resources, marketing and corporate and social responsibility. This difference led to a commonly held notion, among both male and female directors, that female board members were less central to driving their boards’ decisions than their male counterparts. There was a difference in those cases where the chief executive was a woman: then all the women in the boardroom were deeply engaged in both setting strategy and contributing to board decisions.

One of the difficulties in research into gender difference in leadership is simply that it is hard to quantify. Also, it often corresponds to perceptions of gender stereotypes. We need more examples of gender-balanced boards – and especially of boards with three or more women executive directors – to be able to analyse how much gender itself makes a difference.

Liz Bolshaw

Lord Davies’ recommendations may not have gone as far as some European countries and introduced formal quotas for the FTSE 350, but make no mistake – the report has teeth. (more…)

Liz Bolshaw

With quotas off the menu – at least in the short term – the drivers for improving the number of women on UK boards are increasingly expected to be recruitment companies and shareholders. (more…)

Liz Bolshaw

A report published today by the Institute of Leadership & Management in the UK suggests that 73 per cent of women believe the glass ceiling still exists. The survey also finds that more than a third of women believe their gender has hindered their career progression.

These findings come just days before Lord Davies’ much-anticipated report into quotas is due to be published. As reported last week in the Financial Times, it is widely expected that his committee will not be in favour of quotas, instead putting pressure on headhunters to produce candidate lists that include 30 per cent women.

In the ILM online survey of 3,000 managers, evenly split between genders, almost half of women respondents (47 per cent) supported the imposition of quotas, against just 24 per cent of men. Moreover, while women over 45 were most in favour of quotas, with support from two-thirds of the sample, men in the same age group were most strongly opposed to them. Perhaps unsurprisingly, just 38 per cent of male respondents said they believed a glass ceiling still existed.

A clear majority of female managers were in favour of a subtler approach to gender equality in the boardroom and senior management. Almost two-thirds (62 per cent) agreed that “positive action” should be undertaken to increase the number of women in senior positions, compared with 42 per cent of men.

The survey also found a significant gap between men’s confidence and ambitions compared with those of women. While 70 per cent of male respondents described themselves as having “high” or “quite high” levels of confidence, only half of women did. Two-thirds of men said they expected to become managers at the outset of their careers, compared with just half of women.

The report also reveals that women, especially younger women, are more likely to aspire to run their own businesses. A quarter of women under 30 surveyed said they planned to start businesses within 10 years. This finding underlines other media reports, discussed recently in this blog, that women may be leaving working cultures where they feel unwelcome and choosing to go it alone.

Penny de Valk, chief executive of the ILM, had this to say on the findings:

“Employers who are serious about increasing gender diversity at the top need to recognise and respond to these differences, and find ways to nurture women’s ambition. This means developing transparent talent management systems and introducing leadership career models and development approaches that flex to meet individuals’ differing needs. Coaching and mentoring, in particular, have an invaluable role to play here.

“We know that gender diversity drives organisations’ financial performance. Business leaders should need no encouragement to realise this competitive advantage by ensuring their most talented employees move into leadership roles, regardless of their gender.”

Liz Bolshaw

Sasha Galbraith is a US-based consultant specialising in organisational design and promoting diversity in executive management. I spoke to her earlier this week. (more…)

Liz Bolshaw

A report in this weekend’s FT suggested that the UK government-sponsored inquiry into board diversity led by Lord Davies of Abersoch will stop short of imposing quotas for FTSE companies. Instead, the report says, boards may be given a two-year timeframe in which to meet a common minimum target – expected to be between 15 per cent and 30 per cent – to speed up the inclusion of more women on the boards of the UK’s largest companies.

Both the CBI, the employers’ group, and the Institute of Directors have been outspoken in their opposition to any common-to-all, compulsory targets. The CBI suggested that progress should reflect individual companies’ circumstances:

“For example, a media company with a high number of female staff may set a higher target for the number of women on boards, compared with an engineering firm with just a handful of female employees.”

The Institute of Directors is opposed to any imposition whatsoever:

“There are no shortcuts to greater gender diversity in the boardroom. As in other areas of corporate governance, the government should focus on long-term solutions rather than measures – such as board quotas or targets – that merely mask the symptoms of the problem.”

Lord Davies, who is due to report in two weeks’ time, has already disputed some of the arguments against legislative pressure to deliver more diversity. One objection has been the lack of suitably qualified women; another that women will rise to the top by their own efforts without the need for externally imposed targets.

But progress has been too little and too slow. The proportion of women on FTSE 250 company boards is just 7.8 per cent, and more than half of FTSE 250 companies have no women at the top.

In the past few weeks, Michel Barnier, the European Commissioner of Internal Markets, told the Süddeutsche Zeitung, a German national newspaper:

“I am open to the idea of introducing Europe-wide quotas for women – for example, in the boardrooms of publicly traded companies.”

Ursula von der Leyen, co-author of a recent study by the German Institute of Economic Research, has been dismissive of the effectiveness of Germany’s voluntary agreement to increase the number of women on German company boards. She told Der Spiegel magazine:

“The agreement has been an abysmal failure. Almost nothing has changed for women.”

While the UK is unlikely to go as far as Norway or Spain in its demands on listed company boards, there would appear to be consensus building throughout Europe that a degree of push is needed to ensure at least a minimum ratio of women on executive boards.

Liz Bolshaw

With Hollywood awash with Oscar speculation, I have been thinking about awards. (more…)

Liz Bolshaw

In The Social Network, David Fincher’s film, few women players are more than sex toys for the male protagonists, with the possible exception of Erica Albright, Mark Zuckerberg’s on/off girlfriend. Whether or not the film presents an accurate picture of Facebook’s birth, gender does appear to be an issue for technology companies. (more…)

Liz Bolshaw

In Thomas Mann’s novel, The Magic Mountain, Hans Castorp finds it impossible to leave a claustrophobic tuberculosis sanatorium in Davos. How will women attendees at this year’s World Economic Forum react to the Swiss mountain resort’s charms and challenges? (more…)

Liz Bolshaw

It is all too easy to dismiss the 1950s tone of much of Feminist Myths and Magic Medicine, Catherine Hakim’s study for the Centre for Policy Studies, as retrogressive twaddle, and its barmier suggestions have already been discussed here. (more…)

RSS News